SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (42397)12/25/2010 4:25:37 PM
From: John1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
I agree with many of Pat Robertson's conservative views, but in some respects, he is like Joe Biden, Jimmy Carter, Harry Reid, and Barack Hussein Obama. There is no way to predict what asinine comments any of them may suddenly blurt out.

Carter... Traveled to foreign soil and blurted out demeaning comments about the United States.

Biden... Well, everyone knows about his constant propensity for infamous blurt outs. His foot is always in his mouth.

Reid... Loves to blurt out phrases like "negro dialect", "fair skinned", and other bizarre comments when he's not sleeping on the floor of the Senate.

Hussein... Without his trainers and handlers teleprompting him the proper words to say, he routinely blurts out ghetto nonsense. He has been known to blurt out that he's been to 57 states between a series of "ummmms," "uhhhhhs," "ahhhhhs," and "uhhhh, stay with me now...ummmmm," or worse, "I need all Blacks to vote for Democrats before the conservatives turn back the clock on you."

And who can forget Howard Dean blurting out a disturbing "UGAHHHHH" after winning a primary years ago?

The same can be said for the rest of the Democrats and Socialists in office.



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (42397)12/25/2010 5:14:44 PM
From: d[-_-]b1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
I agree it should be decriminalized - not sure I'd want to see it fully legalized with the government involved and dictating who can grow and tax rates. May be a lot more government involvement than the legalization crowd really wants.



To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (42397)12/26/2010 3:45:18 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
I also think pot should be legal, the less government, the better... also, legal pot would completely eliminate the pot cartel's grip on those who use it and the government would have another revenue source, it would be a win-win-win all across the board... also, we're jamming up the jails and prison system with pot people when those spaces could be used to hold real criminals, not to mention the hundreds of millions pissed away each year to pay for the supervision and management of the pot users...

GZ