Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (596366)	12/26/2010 4:50:36 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1575738

Ted, > What I said was is that there are no public records that support the notion that he did exist. There are literally mountains of historical evidence, all a matter of public record. You are distorting what I posted. Public records from the time Jesus purportedly existed make no mention of a Jesus of Nazareth. Writings by individuals 70 years hence do make mention. And yet, not one of those individuals lived during the time of Jesus. Do you believe Mohammad existed; that an archangel of God/Allah dictated the Koran to him in a cave? And yet, you, a scientist, are all to ready to defend what is said on his behalf by people whose motives are very suspect. Nothing "suspect" about their motives. They are very clear. They want to convert people. You think that's a bad thing, but if you think about it, who doesn't want to convert people to their side? Even Bentway wants to "convert" people into his way of thinking. I have no problem with people trying to convert others based on truth. I do have a problem when their efforts are based on mythology.