SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: No Mo Mo who wrote (70105)1/1/2011 12:07:40 AM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217545
 
Cannot comment

Except to say one side of the global warming discussion is wrong, as was one side of bird flu, cholesterol this and such.

Wrong this time has material consequences.

Issue I guess is whether global warming is natural and just minutely enhanced by humans, or actually driven by humans.

Gold man's shadow make me naturally suspicious.

Yes, in any case, less spewing of carbon would be better than more.

Cb ILaine ought to allow the deadbeats drop so that they would give up the two n half cars and spew less.

Everything is connected to everything else, and all effects have causes.



To: No Mo Mo who wrote (70105)1/1/2011 10:34:04 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Respond to of 217545
 
I have children and grand children to consider, not to mention generally wanting things better. More CO2 is better than less. Unlike actual pollutants, any of which are bad in any amounts [lead, mercury, carbon monoxide and smoke in the air] carbon dioxide is good. It's plant food.

Americans have been nobly producing megatons of CO2 for centuries and the rest of us benefit from increased crop production, reduced irrigation requirements and [if we are lucky and we believe your global warming theory] avoidance of the onset of reglaciation.

The first are for real and demonstrable. The avoidance of reglaciation is wishful thinking and the world's pre-eminent climatologist has predicted at least a Little Ice Age for 2020 after the next solar minimum.

Mqurice