Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (42698)	1/1/2011 1:10:07 PM
From: John	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

The government has a good racket going. Any evidence they produce is considered "factual" and cited as such by their loyal followers, typically without rigorous empirical examination. Any evidence that is provided to the contrary is arbitrarily dismissed as "kooksville", even when such evidence is empirical. In the Obama case, not one shred of evidence has been produced to confirm that he was born in the United States. Therefore, all we have to go on are his actions in the matter. The only facts of relevance are: 1. Obama claims he was born in Hawaii. 2. Obama has spent millions of dollars in court to hide the alleged proof of his birth in Hawaii. Without any physical evidence, the only relevant question that exists is, "Why would a man spend millions of dollars in court to conceal his birth certificate and college records?" This simple question does not make any assumptions or suppositions based on hearsay or personal views. We do not know why he is fighting to keep his birth certificate and college records concealed. We only know that he is. For those on the Left who support Obama, why would a man spend millions of dollars in court to conceal his birth certificate and college records, when such documents that could immediately support his claims of citizenship? The larger question is, "How in God's name was a man elected without having to prove who he is?"