Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (12027)	1/3/2011 1:27:04 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

When I asked you "Where are you waging your campaign against science from? A laboratory?" you answered: "YES". Now you are challenged on it and you back off. But if you had not been challenged you would have left it. "your apparent reality as a housemate of someone into shamanism and spirit guides." That fact does not impair my rationalism in the least. You know I said she was "into" those things. The "into" was even put in quotes. Whether you misconstrued her interest in religion accidentally or on purpose is beside the point right now. Because immediately after you misconstrued my remarks I gave several lengthy explanations that my wife and I are "into" religions of all types--NOT believers in religion. To make it understandable for people who were perhaps genuinely THICK rather than just immoral and dishonest, I gave examples to show how being "into" various subjects does not make one a practitioner of those things. I have been in hundreds of churches doing research. I have never worshiped anyone there. So you have no excuse for continuing to misunderstand. Two people on this thread use ad hominems because they are too stupid to debate and it is their only tool. You can be one of them. Be my guest.