Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (31565)	1/5/2011 10:39:09 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

What theories, backed by scientific facts/observations does your side have??? Squat. You only have the extremely cynical and IMMATURE view that the scientists are being fraudulent and bear the same motives as your own (i.e. to scam people). You find it comfortable to scam people, doesn't mean that the experts hold the same value system. You're value system is corrupt and sucks. You don't believe in doing the right thing and potentially averting a disaster. You're ths scammer. Scientific Fact: The current climate conditions have existed many times in the history of the earth. The rate of change is also well within cyclical variations. As far as me being a scammer, I gain nothing either way. The only possible gain that i have is when the wealth redistribution policies brought on in the name of AGW are quashed. AGW is a bunch of feed for the chicken littles of the world. And the IPCC, climate scientists and corporations that support the AGW fraud are the foxes giving you the answers you want to hear as they prepare to chow down. AGW is truly the classic chicken little story. You should read it sometime.