Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (403230)	1/10/2011 3:18:31 PM
From: DMaA	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793958

Here's the first call to trash the 1st amendment over this - democrat of course: According to The Hill, the Democratic lawmaker “plans to introduce legislation that would make it a federal crime to use language or symbols that could be perceived as threatening or inciting violence against a federal official or member of Congress.” pajamasmedia.com

To: Bill who wrote (403230)	1/10/2011 3:21:47 PM
From: goldworldnet	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793958

Democrats will use this to promote more gun control. Republicans should resist that. * * *

To: Bill who wrote (403230)	1/10/2011 3:27:24 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793958

...i have also read that loughner may have a relative that works for the county, so who knows, was there any undue influence there as well (not to prosecute) without a charge and prosecution, i'm not sure there would have been any legal way to restrict his purchasing a handgun without at least some sort of legal action pending