Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (2092)	11/13/1997 12:54:00 AM
From: Petz	Respond to of 6843

ALL, Uberclockmeister Tom is coming up with new NON-INTEL 3D benchmarks. Note what he says: As soon as I'm back from the States I'll add another benchmark to the 3D card review, which should be closer to realworld gaming performance than 3D Winbench. I don't know what you think, but 3D Winbench seems pretty synthetic to me. I found out that even in case of as low results as 75 the 'Forsaken' demo still runs smoothly at a resolution of 800x600. Looking at results of 270 makes you wonder what this is supposed to tell you. It's also well known that the 3D Winbench pretty much favors Intel CPUs, so it's certainly sensible to use another benchmark as well. tomshardware.com Petz