SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CDRD (CD Radio) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Candle stick who wrote (307)11/12/1997 6:43:00 PM
From: Russian Bear  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 904
 
CS,

Please give me the two minute rundown of this situation. I reluctantly covered my (too large) short position some time ago, at a (too large) loss. I have continued to follow CDRD, but not as closely as when I had (too much) money at stake.

This is my understanding, please correct the parts that are wrong:

1. Any preferred "C" shareholder who wishes to convert and sell after Nov. 14th may do so **regardless of what the other shareholders decide to do.** Thus, having "more than 50%" agree to the reorganization implies that "somewhat less than 50%" have refused, and will therefore flip and dump. Is that right?

2. If "enough" preferred holders agree to the reorganization, they will issue a 3.5 million share secondary to help finance the reorganization. What is the magic number? 60%? Or, is the 50+% they already have on board enough? I cannot immagine they could *both* manage to do a secondary *and* absorb the conversion of a large percentage of the old preferred holders.... the secondary would have to go off at a *very* low number, right?

3. What am I missing? This looks too easy. The last time I thought CDRD was giving away free money to anyone willing to short the stock, I got hammered, in a very big way. Is it reasonable to anticipate that Merril Lynch will prop the stock up, for purposes of the secondary? Something else?

The more I think about their press release, the more it seems that you are right, and that this is their way of conceeding defeat. But, I have learned (the hard way) to be cautious.

Sorry for the request, but if you could catch me up on the in's and out's of this situation, I would much appreciate it.

TIA,
RB



To: Candle stick who wrote (307)11/15/1997 6:31:00 PM
From: murph  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 904
 
I would like to discuss several other issues that fit into your criteria for short-selling. I beleive you have a talent for isolating issues that have hot-air and are going to collapse. I would like to give you my phone number but I cannot find your e-mail address so please either e-mail me yours or send me the address so we can speak. My greatest short has been ONSL in the high 20's covered recently at 19-20 1/2 in about 3 weeks. I have others but do not want to discuss them on this chat-room. Look forward to speaking with you soon.