Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (24877)	1/16/2011 4:31:59 PM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Respond to of 86352

I don't have to, the scientific community has been doing it for years with hundreds of papers published in the worlds leading peer reviewed journals Peer reviewed means nothing when your peers are sycophants. Need I remind you of the CRU fiasco where dissenting opinions were prevented from being received by these so-called "peer reviewed" journals? Many will find the report indulgent of reprehensible behaviour, particularly in peer review, where CRU researchers have been accused of misusing their seniority in climate science to block criticism. Brutal exchanges in which researchers boasted of "going to town" to prevent publication of papers critical of their work, and in which they conspired to blacklist journals that published hostile papers, were dismissed by Russell as "robust" and "typical of the debate that can go on in peer review". guardian.co.uk guardian.co.uk Didn't know you were religious. I'm not.. I'm spiritual.. Religions are created by men, not God. Just as Pseudo-Science is a creation of mankind, not the revealing of God's creation. Scientists have been using computers and models for many decades.. Garbage in.. Garbage out.. And it is plainly obvious to ALL OBJECTIVE OBSERVERS that data has been manipulated, and vital variables excluded, in order to make the science support the desired political outcome.. Again.. just look at the surface station data.. and where they are located (most in the middle of man-made urban heat islands). The data upon which those computer models are based is clearly suspect, if not outright flawed. The collection process needs to be "reset" and data accumulated in a manner than cannot be so easily corrupted, let alone questions. There needs to be a complete overhaul of the data collection process and how it is used in computer models. Stick to the dark ages, you didn't need science back in those days! You mean the Medieval Warm Period, reportedly just as warm, or even warmer, than global temps are today? windows2universe.org windows2universe.org I wonder if there would be any Vikings sailing around the N. Atlantic were their temperatures the same as this winter? Hawk

To: Eric who wrote (24877)	1/16/2011 5:55:48 PM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86352

Btw, Eric.. why are you so afraid of dissenting scientific opinions being presented? I'm personally agnostic about Climate Change.. collect the CREDIBLE DATA, analyze and scrutinize it according the scientific method.. and let the chips fall where they may.. Hawk