Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (598324)	1/17/2011 1:10:20 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577194

Inode, it was because of Reagan that Bill Clinton was able to reduce military spending, control the deficit, balance the budget, and usher in an economic boom. But even that wouldn't have been possible if Clinton didn't shift toward the middle after the 1994 midterms. Tenchusatsu

To: i-node who wrote (598324)	1/17/2011 2:08:43 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577194

Try this Dave: zfacts.com Why Reagan/Bush/BushII caused us to go 9.2 TRILLION in debt.

To: i-node who wrote (598324)	1/18/2011 8:38:57 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1577194

>> If your frigging precious stupid Reagan had not come into power, this is what this country's debt would look like: It is a dead link, It is? It comes up for everyone else but you. You do know how to operate a computer, don't you? but it doesn't matter because the argument is sheer idiocy and presumes that some other president would have been able to control expenditures better than Reagan, which they WOULD NOT. Pull up the link. You're the idiot for expounding on something you didn't bother to look at. What a lazy mind you have. More importantly, we would have never seen the peace dividend from Reagan having won the Cold War, and we would STILL be engaged in an arms race today with the Soviet Union. Don't reply. You're too f*cking stupid to have this discussion. LOL. You are incapable of handling a discussion. Your MO is to tell people how it is without the facts to back you up.....a typical winger operation.