Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas L Nielsen who wrote (35303)	11/12/1997 8:23:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 58324

>>At 30 a one point swing is~ñ3% and at 15 the same one point swing is~ñ6%. So I figure the percentage swings will probably be greater after the split.<< But by splitting, there is also share dilution which tends to diminish any price swings either way. IOM's rather boring price fluctuations presently could get even more so after another split. Really, this split is genuinely a bad decision at the present time.

To: Thomas L Nielsen who wrote (35303)	11/12/1997 8:31:00 PM
From: tom lenaerts	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

To Brendon. I own a lot of Iomega but not a Zip.That s ok. This company will make me enough money to buy as manny as i want to. To Tom Trawinski. Don't buy Worldcom. They print stocks as if they were monopoly-money. To all. What' going on in your Us of A? Fed keeps everything the way it was. Still Dow goes down. That's gonna cost me a lot of money tomorrow here in Belgium. Thank God there is Iomega.

To: Thomas L Nielsen who wrote (35303)	11/12/1997 8:36:00 PM
From: Richard Smith	Respond to of 58324

<<Linda- At 30 a one point swing is~ñ3% and at 15 the same one point swing is~ñ6%. So I figure the percentage swings will probably be greater after the split.>> and a one point swing on your split shares would be equivalent to a two point move on the pre-split ones. it would be the same +-6%.

To: Thomas L Nielsen who wrote (35303)	11/12/1997 8:40:00 PM
From: Greg Keeler	Respond to of 58324

More shares outstanding equals more institutional interest and (hopefully) ownership--those big funds like a lot of liquidity,as we know. Judy Keeler