SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J.B.C. who wrote (405481)1/20/2011 12:46:38 PM
From: Paul Smith1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794001
 
And had O'Donnell won, who would be Senate Majority leader?

Harry Reid.


That is correct but there may be times when we could use an extra vote in the Senate. By running a lightweight with only a slim chance of victory, we lost that extra vote on some filibusters etc. I'm assuming Mike Castle is similar to Scott Brown. We are fortunate that Scott Brown is in the Senate(relative to the alternative) even if we don't agree with him on all issues. At an individual state level, there are some states (like Mass.) where a Scott Brown or a Mike Castle is all that is possible.



To: J.B.C. who wrote (405481)1/20/2011 12:52:41 PM
From: Brumar892 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794001
 
If O'Donnell had won, she wouldn't be voting with Reid. I think Castle would have.

Plus a message was sent to other RINO's.



To: J.B.C. who wrote (405481)1/20/2011 4:23:47 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Respond to of 794001
 
"And had O'Donnell won, who would be Senate Majority leader?

Harry Reid."

Of course - but if we had won Nevada and Maryland - perhaps we could also have flipped a D. In either case Reid would not have been majority leader and perhaps the majority leader would have been a R.

Bob