SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (98718)1/20/2011 3:06:46 PM
From: tonto2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
Rasmussen, Ipsos Most Accurate 2008 Election Polls
The current winning percentage for President-Elect Barack Obama in the election is 52%-46%. So how did the final polls from major polling organizations shape up with the actual winning percentage? Rasmussen and Ipsos were dead on, and Fox News got the margin almost spot on as well:

52%-46% Rasmussen
53%-46% Ipsos/McClatchey
50%-43% Fox News
52%-44% IBD/TIPP

Zogby had an 11-point margin for Obama - 54%-43%, along with Gallup - 55%-44%. When it comes to even-handed, reliable polling, you cannot do better than Rasmussen.

UPDATE: CBS News predicted a 51%-42% Obama win; NBC News had it 51%-43%; ABC News had it 53%-44%.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (98718)1/20/2011 6:25:29 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 224748
 
lol



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (98718)1/20/2011 7:28:27 PM
From: Ann Corrigan1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
hehe..any poll that supports your position is non-partisan, is that right Ken.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (98718)1/20/2011 7:48:50 PM
From: Ann Corrigan3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224748
 
Your favorite Ken..
anncoulter.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (98718)1/20/2011 9:37:33 PM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224748
 
Yes, Virginia, A Climate Cover-Up

Posted 06:53 PM ET

Junk Science: Democrats in Virginia are trying to stop their attorney general from probing climate fraud carried out by university researchers at taxpayer expense. Are they afraid of finding the inconvenient truth?

It's not the crime, it's the cover-up, as the saying goes. In the case of former University of Virginia climate scientist Michael Mann and his supporters, it may be both. Not only did Mann participate in perhaps the greatest scam of modern times, but he may have also have fraudulently used taxpayer funds to do so.

At least Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli thinks so, and has been diligently trying to obtain from U.Va. documents and e-mails related to Mann's work there. Mann reportedly received around $500,000 from taxpayer-funded grants from the university for research there from 1999 to 2005.

Cuccinelli is alleging a possible violation of a 2002 statute, the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act. The AG has said that he wants the documents, including grant applications and e-mails exchanged between Mann and 39 other scientists and university staffers, to help determine whether Mann committed fraud by knowingly manipulating data as he sought the taxpayer-funded grants for his research.

Mann was at the heart of the ClimateGate scandal when e-mails were unearthed from Britain's Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. In one e-mail sent to Mann and others by CRU director Philip Jones, Jones speaks of the "trick" of filling in gaps of data in order to hide evidence of temperature decline:

"I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (i.e. from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline." It was that attempt to "hide the decline" through the manipulation of data that brought down the global warming house of cards.

Mann was the architect behind the famous "hockey stick" graph that was produced in 1999 but which really should be called the "hokey stick." Developed by Mann using manipulated tree-ring data, it supposedly proved that air temperatures had been stable for 900 years, then soared off the charts in the 20th century.

Mann et al. had to make the Medieval Warm Period (about A.D. 800 to 1400) and the Little Ice Age (A.D. 1600 to 1850) statistically disappear.

The graph relied on data from trees on the Yamal Peninsula in Siberia. Here, too, the results were carefully selected. Just 12 trees from the 252 cores in the CRU's Yamal data set were used. A larger data set of 34 tree cores from the vicinity showed no dramatic recent warming, and warmer temperatures in the middle ages. They were not included.

Attempting to block Cuccinelli and rising to Mann's defense are Virginia state senators Chap Petersen and Donald McEachin. They are backing legislation that would strip the attorney general's office of its power to issue "civil investigative demands," otherwise known as subpoenas, under the 2002 statute.

They claim they are defending academic freedom, but they are trying to hide what many consider academic fraud, work that found its way into the reports of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It led to Kyoto and Copenhagen, and formed the basis for the EPA's endangerment finding that carbon dioxide is a pollutant that needs to be regulated.

After Mann left U.Va., he went to Penn State, which the Obama administration awarded with $541,184 in economic stimulus funds to save, according to recovery.gov, 1.62 jobs so that Professor Mann could continue his tree-ring circus fraudulently advancing the myth of man-made global warming that through equally bogus remedies like cap-and-trade and EPA regulations would bring the U.S. economy to its knees.

In a glaringly arrogant e-mail, Mann said he was grateful to the legislators for pressing the issue and hoped the action would give Cuccinelli "some second thoughts about continuing to waste their time and resources attacking well-established science." Hide the decline, then hide the truth.

We hope the legislation fails, the truth will come out and Mann et al. will be held accountable for engineering a scientific and economic fraud that would have made Bernie Madoff blush.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (98718)1/21/2011 12:42:28 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224748
 
Just who is really Obama's father?
Jack Cashill
January 20, 2011
wnd.com


As I was wrapping up my research on my forthcoming book, "Deconstructing Obama," I asked three of the independent investigators with whom I had been consulting who they thought was the biological father of President Barack Obama.

To the uninitiated, this may seem a bizarre question. But those who have followed this story – now, perhaps, including Hawaii's blundering Gov. Neil Abercrombie – will not be surprised to learn that I got three different answers, each of them plausible.

In the book, I follow all three lines of inquiry, but new evidence strengthens the case against Barack Obama Sr.

Thanks to the investigative work of Jerome Corsi, WND readers know the basic holes in the Obama story. Bottom line: When Obama told the nation's schoolchildren in September 2009, "My father left my family when I was 2 years old, and I was raised by a single mother," he was lying.

There never was a family. Obama and his mother, Ann Dunham, found themselves in Seattle when Obama was weeks old, and Obama Sr. left Hawaii for good in June 1962. This was before Obama's first birthday and before Obama Sr.'s presumed wife and son returned to Hawaii. This much is beyond dispute.

Although there is evidence of a Dunham-Obama divorce, there is no hard evidence of a wedding – no witnesses, no photos, no rings, no signed marriage certificate – and, of course, no long-form birth certificate, either.

Stand up for truth and transparency -- and the Constitution! Magnetic bumper sticker declares: "Birther on Board"

The lack of documentation comes to play in a previously overlooked passage from "Dreams from My Father." As Obama tells the story, Obama Sr. had children with at least four different women, two of them American, two African. Ruth Nidesand, a white American, had two children by Obama Sr., Mark and David, the latter of whom died young in a motorcycle accident.

When Obama Sr. died in 1982, lawyers contacted anyone who might have claim to the estate. "Unlike my mum," Obama tells his half-sister Auma in "Dreams," "Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was."

Ruth obviously could produce a marriage license and a birth certificate for her son Mark. Although Obama alludes to finding his own "birth certificate" in "Dreams," Ann Dunham apparently could not produce one that tied him to Obama Sr., this despite a potential payoff if she did.

Then, too, those who have read "Dreams" are almost invariably surprised by the fond memories Ann's father, Stanley Dunham, has of his putative son-in-law. These memories do not deceive.

A photo taken on the occasion of Obama Sr.'s celebratory departure from Hawaii shows a smiling Stanley Dunham – looking all the world like a young Barack Obama Jr. – standing right next to the African guy who allegedly knocked up his 17-year-old daughter and is now abandoning them. As the father of two daughters, this doesn't smell right at all.

One of my correspondents – let's call him Frank Hardy – is convinced that the Dunham family left for Hawaii abruptly right after Ann's graduation in June 1960 because Ann was pregnant. He makes a good case.

If a black guy had impregnated Ann, this would explain the family's abrupt departure to Hawaii, the one state in the union where a mixed-race baby could grow up almost unnoticed. It certainly explains the move to Hawaii better than the dreamy rationale Stanley Dunham offers in "Dreams."

This scenario makes sense of any number of other details as well, like Ann's angry resistance to the move, her mother's willingness to quit her job as an escrow officer in nearby Bellevue, Wash., Ann's poor performance in her limited first-semester courses at the University of Hawaii, her failure to enroll for the second semester and, most of all, her otherwise inexplicable return to Seattle in August 1961 – if not earlier.

True, to make this scenario work, we have to add one major variable, but it is a credible one. Imagine Ann coming home from class one day in Hawaii in fall 1960 in one of her all-concealing muumuus – she had written friends that muumuus were worn on campus – and telling her father about a charming, larger-than-life Kenyan in her class.

The scheming Stanley befriends Barack Sr. and enlists him in his plot. He explains that a boy named Barack, the legitimate son of a Kenyan, could move through American life more seamlessly than a boy named, say, Stanley, the illegitimate son of an American black.

Stanley tells Barack Sr. that he can make it worth his while. Ann understands. As to Barack Sr., he has to contribute nothing to the proceedings but his name – with his "son" born in February 1961, not August.

A marriage license from Maui – the county specified in the divorce papers – assures that no marriage announcement will appear in the Honolulu papers. Ann will leave in time for the 1961 fall semester at the University of Washington – perhaps months before – and she will not return until Obama Sr. leaves for Harvard.

Frank Hardy has found another clue that bolsters his argument. In an online forum dated March 14, 2009, Ann's high-school classmate Joelle Hannum comments innocently, "I can remember the rumors about [Ann] and another classmate who were involved with and married African-American men, and believe me in those days it was looked at with a LOT of negativity." As another friend had earlier testified, Ann never dated "the crew-cut white boys."

A thorough investigator, Hardy called Joelle Hannum to follow up. He immediately wrote down what she told him: "By request of President Obama, we [she and her classmates] have decided not to give out any more information. I have to hang up now. Goodbye."

I am occasionally asked why any of this matters. The fact is that Obama rode to the presidency on an apocryphal story. The dissembling that he has had to do to hold it together has cost at least one good man his freedom and his career.

If nothing else, our commander in chief owes Lt. Col. Terry Lakin the truth.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (98718)1/21/2011 1:31:49 PM
From: Hope Praytochange1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224748
 
Georgia's jobless rise hits the traditional, two-income family [The Atlanta Journal-Constitution] 01/21 06:56 AM



Jan. 21--The Walkers of Suwanee lived the good suburban life before the Great Recession hit. Tom and Mary Walker raised three boys, traveled freely, golfed regularly and dined without worry at Taste of Thai or LongHorn.
Then in June 2008 Tom lost his job with Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Mary became the sole breadwinner, and their household dynamic eroded along with their standard of living.
No one knows exactly how many Georgia families with similar stories are encompassed by the state's stubbornly high unemployment rate, which reached 10.2 percent in December, according to figures released Thursday by the state labor department. But there's no doubt that the numbers are moving in the wrong direction.
December's jobless rate is an increase from November's 10 percent. Worse, the number of people who, like Tom Walker, have been without a job for at least 27 weeks rose to 260,000, an increase of 7,000 from the previous year. Today, the long-term unemployed make up more than half of all jobless Georgians.
"The increase in unemployment and job loss in December is continued evidence that Georgia's job market is fragile," new Labor Commissioner Mark Butler said in a statement Thursday.
It's clear, too, that men like Walker, battered by the recession's assault on male-dominated industries --construction, manufacturing and finance --comprise a much larger portion of the long-term jobless than do women. This downturn is remarkable for the sharp rise in households where the wife supplants the husband as the main moneymaker.
"Through previous recessions I was always the dependable one. I'd bring home the bacon and her job was gravy," said Walker, 54, seated at the kitchen table in sweats. "Now, she's the only barrier between us and the street."
The recession may have technically ended a year-and-a-half ago, but Georgia families increasingly struggle with the financial fallout when a spouse is laid off. Homes are lost. Credit is ruined. Quality of life, as the male breadwinner becomes a financial albatross, suffers.
Anger and resentment have been building in the Scandrett household in Forest Park ever since Mariquez lost his elevator mechanic job last May. Monthly income dropped from $6,000 to $2,000, which is mostly Angela's salary.
They no longer have health insurance, and Angela has asthma. The mortgage company won't reduce their monthly payments. They worry they'll lose the house.
"We argue more. It's mainly about money and spending," said Angela, 39, a hair stylist. "I've told him, 'You need to step it up. Go work at McDonald's (MCD:$74.8281,$-0.3319,-0.44%) . You've got to swallow your pride.' "
Mariquez, for his part, said he is searching hard to find work and has even lowered his expectations. Angela sees her husband up early filling out applications on the computer, and she sees his growing frustration.
He said, "The more I try, the more it stays the same."
Nationwide, two-thirds of the 11 million jobs lost during this recession were held by men. The jobless gender gap is the largest since 1948, when the U.S. Department of Labor started tracking it.
Unlike traditional male occupations, typical women's work --teaching, nursing, retail, day care --has largely withstood the recession's ravages. And that means wives increasingly shoulder the household's financial weight.
Heather Boushey, senior economist with the Center for American Progress think tank in Washington, notes that the Great Recession is the first major downturn during which both husband and wife generally were employed. During the early 1980s recession, for example, most wives remained at home.
"Since the majority of mothers are breadwinners or co-breadwinners, unemployment plays out differently than it did during the era when women were stay-at-home moms," Boushey said. "Two million wives support unemployed husbands. That shows just how important women's earnings are to family well-being."
Just prior to the recession in 2007, 2.4 percent of working wives had an unemployed husband at home. Two years later, as the recession raged, 5.4 percent did, Boushey reported.
But because wives, on average, earned only 42 percent of a household's pre-layoff earnings, families struggle to make health insurance, mortgage and car payments, especially once the husband's unemployment benefits run out.
Tom Walker rides the unemployment roller-coaster of job-prospect highs followed by rejection lows. A former IT manager, Walker has networked, started a consultancy and applied for 800 jobs, including low-paying positions with Starbucks (SBUX:$33.39,00$0.21,000.63%) , Quik-Trip, Aldi and Kauffman Tire. No luck. A combined $150,000 income has dwindled to $60,000 a year. And Walker's weekly $330 unemployment benefits ran out in November.
"Satan will occasionally get in there and start talking to me: 'You ought to be angry. These are the prime working years of your life,' " Walker, a devout Catholic, said. "He tries to make you despondent and depressed and angry."
His distress deepened after Mary suffered a badly broken ankle in a February 2009 car accident.
A Gwinnett County middle school teacher, Mary returns home tired and sore. Tom prepares dinner and tries to make home-life as stress-free as possible.
"If I'd been working all this time, and the accident had happened, she'd probably be looking at early retirement," Walker said. "That's what's painful and leads to a sense of helplessness. She's having to wrap up her ankle tight and keep trucking because I'm not contributing financially."
At the Scandrett household, Angela said she's making more of the decisions. When she wants to talk, she said, Mariquez often seems busy searching for something on his phone. As for the arguing, the couple has decided to try a truce.
"It's kind of turned the tables. I'm kind of in charge," she said. "It's hard because you want to give the man the respect."
To see more of The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to ajc.com.
Copyright (c) 2011, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services. For more information about the content services offered by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services (MCT), visit www.mctinfoservices.com.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (98718)1/22/2011 11:55:39 AM
From: lorne  Respond to of 224748
 
ken..with the mind set of these guys they would make good far left democrat party members...they will believe anything their leader/dictator tells them.

Afterlife inflation: Have jihadists had to raise martyrdom incentive?
By Adam Levine, CNN
January 20th, 2011
religion.blogs.cnn.com

The promise of 70 or 72 virgins upon martyrdom has become a familiar expression in discussions among Islamic extremists, but a recent terror indictment raises the peculiar question of whether the incentive has been increased.

The case involves a man suspected of conspiring with a terrorist network responsible for the deaths of five U.S. soldiers in Iraq. He was arrested Wednesday in Canada, according to a statement from the U.S. attorney's office for the Eastern District of New York.

Faruq Khalil Muhammad, 38, was charged with conspiring to kill Americans abroad and providing material support to a terrorist network that conducted suicide bombings in Iraq, the statement said.

The complaint quotes from wiretaps of conversations between the defendant and the potential suicide bombers he is alleged to having aided.

In one snippet of conversation from March 2009, the defendant is encouraging a reluctant "Fighter 5" who is concerned about his mother. In the course of encouraging "Fighter 5," the complaint shows an inflation in the promise of virgins after martyrdom.

"May God give you 74 to marry. We want virgins of paradise, not the ones here," said "Fighter 5," according to the criminal complaint.

"You come short, brother," the complaint quotes Muhammad as responding. "God is more generous than that. It's supposed to be 76."

The promise of 76 is higher than even the defendant believes is traditionally due. In October 2009, according to the complaint, the defendant explains to his own mother the rewards of jihad.

"Do you know mother that when a martyr dies, he would have 7 characteristics. First, he receives forgiveness for all his sins, then he gets to see his own seat in paradise," the complaint alleges Muhamad said. "Also he gets to have 70 virgins."

So is the promised reward of martyrdom suffering from some sort of spiritual inflation? Is 70 no longer enough incentive?

"It seems to be an inaccurate and carelessly cited figure," said Dr. John Esposito, a professor at Georgetown University and author of The Future of Islam.

There is nothing in the Quran that rewards a suicide bomber, or martyr, with virgins, Esposito said.

"This has become a popular belief in some circles but is not based on scripture," Esposito explained.

The Quran does speak of "houris," dark-eyed or black-eyed virgins, noted Esposito, as a reward for men in paradise, but not specifically for martyrdom.

The number, typically 70 or 72, is not in the Quran, said Esposito, but rather comes from the oral tradition.

The focus on virgins as a reward for martyrdom is a modern phenomena said Salah Hassan, an associate professor at Michigan State University and coordinator of the school's Islam, Muslim and Journalism Education project. Interestingly, Hassan said, the virgin promise is one that is used both by jihadists to entice recruits and on the other side by those critical of Islam.

"It is polarized views sharing a particular image for different ends," Hassan said.

"They are in a way tapping into a public discourse in the U.S. because it is not widely cited by Muslims to promote jihad. It is more recent usage," Hassan said. "My sense is that is very often cited in the U.S. as a way of basically showing how vulgar Muslim piety is. To a degree that these images mean anything, they are interpretable. It is a metaphor. There is obviously not 72 virgins waiting for anybody in paradise."

Hassan said that inflated rhetoric is a hallmark of jihadist discourse, noting that the defendant is alleged to have written in an e-mail message "he is not just 100% but 1,000,000% with you. He is with you on the doctrine, the loyalty and the enmity and everything one million percent."

"These guys are obviously inflating and I am sure the rhetoric is inflated," Hassan observed. The promise of 76 is part of that exaggeration.

"The act itself is exaggerated. The idea you would blow yourself up is excessive. So it is all in excess. How would you justify an excessive thing?" said Hassan. "Muslims think (of) suicide bombing as unacceptable. It is not Muslim. It is weird extremism that looks for justification within extremism for rationales and recruits."

Brian Fishman, a terrorist analyst at the New America Foundation and researcher for the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, said, "They are rhetorically upping the ante to convince a guy who is wavering."

Fishman said the promise of virgins in exchange for martyrdom continues to be a common recruiting element in the online jihadist forums he monitors. Fishman said a much less talked-about incentive is the promise that a martyr can name 70 family members to heaven. But Fishman said the real recruiting pitch is to defend an Islamic country from an infidel force.

"Once you do that, you did a wonderful deed, you get the rewards," said Fishman.

Raising the number of post-martyrdom virgins to 76 does not reflect "a real ideological shift," concluded Fishman.

In the end, "Fighter 5" was stopped before he could complete his mission, turned back by the Tunisian government trying to cross into Libya, according to the complaint.