SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Trimble Navigation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (1830)11/12/1997 10:20:00 PM
From: Robert A. Sutherland  Respond to of 3506
 
I am not qualified to answer this question properly, as I only
partially understand the signal processing involved. I will
query the expert, and if he is forthcoming, I will respond later. It
is covered in a patent, but I haven't read it. I doubt it is quasi-
legal. My guess is it was closer to embarrassing. Every armor
has it's chink:-)

As far as differential issues are concerned, this product was
developed as an enhancement to the codeless dual channel receiver
(that I worked on) used for survey. The way to dynamically model
the ionosphere permitivity (hence, phase velocity) is through carrier
phase offset at two-frequencies (they have to be phase coherent at
the source.. and since they are both locked to the same cesium, they
are). A codeless receiver runs the L2 signal through a squaring loop,
which DESTROYS the information on the carrier, but preserverves the
phase information at twice the frequency. This phase information is
then used as a second frequency collocated to the same differential
sites. This give first order survey results. Most first generation
dual-frequency survey receivers use this technique.

Differential (real-time or post processed) can also be in the form
of code. This is used for the lower accuracy applications,
and works through a radio link that corrects S/A inaccuracies by
telling the unknown location what it's almanac and ephemeris errors
are.

This is mostly for the benefit of those that don't know, and would
like to. Hopefully you don't mind.



To: Petz who wrote (1830)11/13/1997 12:13:00 PM
From: George Thompson  Respond to of 3506
 
Just a comment about jamming... As a rule rf at these freqs would normally be considered a point source except for predictable backscatter conditions and off some terain. Then again, your talking about quite a bit of power. Multipoint sources can be picked up by sidelobe characteristics of most flatpanel antennas.
I enjoy GPS on auto trips and through amateur radio packet modes of transmission and propagation prediction.

73,
GEorge
wb9yrr