Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (88197)	1/20/2011 10:59:08 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 149317

<<What do you think of these "for profit" colleges like U of Phoenix and Kaplan U?>> I think they have their place and are very good. But first and foremost we must consider our society as a whole. The best security we can provide is a highly educated populace. Especially now. We need a Marshall plan for education. We need to make sure every kid in this country has access to free education and we have to let kids try more than once. If they flunk out in high school, give them a second chance in a community college and then if they do well there (which the vast majority do) let them go to the higher institutions. Our populace is way under educated. I am an old man now and I look around and see the level of thinking and am aghast. The entire Republican party is filled with goof balls. The Chinese are going to take us apart. And having a senile Raygun, and an alcohol brain damaged little bush and neo con nut jobs, playing poker against Johnny Chan has devastated us. At least the Chinese and the rest of the world respects Obama. If we vote in Huckabee in 2012 we are lost. Thanks god for Obama and the liberal dems. He can keep up with them and so can the liberal dems like Al Franken (smartest guy in senate).

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (88197)	1/21/2011 9:22:04 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 149317

Running the government on 8¢ By Jeanne Sahadi, senior writerJanuary 21, 2011: 5:19 AM ET NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Those who clamor for more "limited government" rarely define what they mean. But assuming nothing changes over the next decade, Americans could be left with a de facto limited government -- limited in what it will be able to do. Today, the United States spends roughly 76 cents of every federal tax dollar on just four things: Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and interest on the $14 trillion debt. That leaves 24 cents of revenue to pay for everything else the federal government does. That's not a lot. But it's a mint compared to what could be left over by 2020, according to a simulation made by the Government Accountability Office. Barring serious efforts to curb the growth in the country's debt, by 2020 Washington could be spending 92 cents of every tax dollar on Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and interest alone. That would leave just 8 cents to pay for everything else. How much of "everything else" can 8 cents buy? Not a lot, especially relative to what Americans are accustomed to their government providing. Rundown on Obama debt commission proposals Things like the national parks, the FBI, student loans, air traffic controllers, defense, the interstate highway system and food safety. The list goes on and on. To give a better sense of just how much government would have to cut back, consider this: In 2010, Uncle Sam took in $2.162 trillion in federal revenue -- and 8% of that is $173 billion. Here's a sampling of what that $173 billion could have paid for last year: * The Department of Labor ($173 billion) OR ... * One-fourth of defense spending ($667 billion) OR ... * The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (roughly $170 billion) OR ... * Most but not all of the interest owed on the country's debt ($228 billion) OR ... * The Departments of Transportation ($78 billion), Justice ($30 billion) and Housing and Urban Development ($60 billion); plus the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ($5 billion) OR ... * The Departments of Agriculture ($129 billion), Energy ($31 billion) and Commerce ($13 billion) OR ... * The Departments of Education ($93 billion) and Homeland Security ($44 billion), plus NASA ($19 billion), the EPA ($11 billion) and the parks, fish and wild life services ($6 billion). Beyond 2020, the 8 cents to pay for "everything else" would get whittled down to zero. By 2040, there would only be enough in federal tax revenue to pay for interest on the debt and Social Security, according to Susan Irving, GAO's director of federal budget analysis. Sure, the country could try to borrow to pay for what revenue can't cover. But given the magnitude of what would have to be borrowed, the interest costs alone would be prohibitive. Another alternative: the government could abruptly raise taxes sky high and cut spending to the bone. This is just one reason why the country's fiscal course is often described as "unsustainable." And that's why Irving and others say lawmakers and the public need to ask some tough questions about their priorities and their means. "What is it that the government should do? What would that cost? Are you willing to spend that?" Or, Irving suggested, "What do you want to pay for government and what will that cover? Can that fund your priorities?" In the abstract, she noted, "Everybody wants a small government. Everybody would like low taxes. And they'd like government to do everything that they think government should do. But the arithmetic can be a problem." To top of page