Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Mobile Computing - OSs & Manufacturers UNMODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (878)	1/23/2011 2:09:37 PM
From: sylvester80	Respond to of 3170

You are wrong... as always... it took no time to "clone" iPad as you say as the iPad and iPhone share the same OS with no difference other than the resolution and apps who take advantage of that resolution. The Android Galaxy Tax was exactly that long time ago. Meaning the same OS as the phone OS with higher resolution and the apps to take advantage of that higher resolution. So Android already had an iPad clone as you call it (only better as it had 2 cameras and was expandable and had real multitasking and access to the full web, unlike the iCrap) and in fact it sold well and ahead of projections and Samsung had to increase production to meet demand. But Google, correctly so, knew that the world needed an Android version specifically for tablets. And for that we have Honeycomb. Apple HAS NOTHING like Honeycomb. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. It's like night and day. Apples and Oranges. If you want a tablet you would buy a Honeycomb tablet. If you want an oversize iPhone, go ahead and buy the iCrap...except worse... it doesn't even have a camera or a front one and it does not do video calls. Even the Galaxy Tab has done that for months now... goes to show you what a bunch of junk the iSheep buys with the iCrap.