SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio candidates - Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2790)1/25/2011 1:55:22 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
EMC Fourth-Quarter Profit Rises 61% on Storage Demand (Update1)

By Dina Bass

Jan. 25 (Bloomberg) -- EMC Corp., the world’s biggest maker of storage computers, reported a 61 percent increase in fourth- quarter profit and predicted full-year earnings topping analysts’ estimates as companies upgrade their data centers.

Profit, excluding some costs, rose to 42 cents a share, EMC said today. Analysts estimated 41 cents, the average of projections compiled by Bloomberg. Sales increased 19 percent to $4.89 billion, topping the $4.79 billion average estimate.

Companies are spending more on information technology and investing in new storage computers to hold the increasing amounts of data and manage disaster recovery, according to Daniel Ives, an analyst at FBR Capital Markets. New products are helping EMC sell more to the largest corporations, while demand remains stable among mid-sized companies, he said.

“The company’s better-than-expected initial guidance range for 2011 on both the top and bottom line is a positive indicator for EMC as well as in improving IT spending environment,” Ives said in a note to clients today. Ives is based in New York and rates the stock “outperform.”

EMC has a majority stake in VMware Inc., the biggest maker of so-called virtualization programs, which let computers run multiple operating systems. VMware shares slumped as much as 6.4 percent today after the company yesterday forecast a slowdown in new license sales and said that margins would be little changed this year.

"People are factoring in VMware," said Brent Bracelin, an analyst at Pacific Crest Securities in Portland, Oregon, who rates EMC "outperform." "VMware is impacting EMC today more than EMC’s own results, which were good numbers."

EMC fell 17 cents to $23.66 at 10:22 a.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares climbed 31 percent last year.

Full-Year Earnings

The company, based in Hopkinton, Massachusetts, said full- year sales will be $19.6 billion and profit, excluding some items, will be $1.46 a share. Analysts on average estimate full- year profit of $1.45 and sales of $19 billion.

"The market is primed and ready and we have the right assets to help our customers," Chief Financial Officer David Goulden said on a conference call with analysts.

Net income last quarter rose to $628.6 million, or 29 cents a share, from $390.6 million, or 19 cents, a year earlier.

The company said it plans to buy back $1.5 billion in shares this year.

(EMC had a conference call today to discuss earnings. Go to emc.com for a replay.)

To contact the reporters on this story: Dina Bass in Seattle at dbass2@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: January 25, 2011 10:23 EST



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2790)1/25/2011 6:17:58 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Google’s Larry Page Will Be the New Jerry Yang – Not the Next Steve Jobs: The Return of the Co-Founder

life.backwest.com



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2790)1/29/2011 7:00:47 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 2955
 
Microsoft loses three more cloud-savvy heavy hitters

infoworld.com

Brain drain in Redmond turns into outright hemorrhage, as three more key players depart -- including the head of Office 365

JANUARY 27, 2011

By Woody Leonhard | InfoWorld

Keeping track of the revolving doors to Redmond's executive washrooms is turning into a full-time pursuit.

Cloud visionary Ray Ozzie announced his departure in October (see "Ray Ozzie's leaving Microsoft: What took him so long?"). Cloud-savvy Bob Muglia announced his retirement as president of the Server and Tools Division -- including the Azure effort -- a couple of weeks ago (see "With Muglia gone, who will succeed Ballmer?"). Last May, Robbie Bach left as president of the Entertainment Division. Xbox and Zune tech luminary J Allard left at the same time. Last September, Stephen Elop left as president of the Business Division, including Office. Brad Brooks, the head of Windows marketing to consumers, left last week.

Now in the past 24 hours we've seen details about the defections of three more heavy hitters.

First came news that Microsoft filed a lawsuit, then sought and received a restraining order, against Matt Miszewski. He's the former general manager of worldwide government in the Microsoft Dynamics group, where he guided "the business, technical, and architectural structure of Microsoft's offerings in the government industry." He left Microsoft at the end of December.

Last week, Salesforce.com announced that Miszewski was their new senior VP of global public sector, where he "will lead Salesforce.com's global public sector initiatives to help governments make their citizens more successful through the power of cloud computing." Microsoft claims that Miszewski violated his noncompete and confidentiality agreements by taking this new job, bringing with him detailed knowledge about Microsoft's Dynamics CRM products, and the future direction of Azure.

Then we heard that Dave Thompson, corporate VP of online services, the guy who's in charge of Office 365 and Microsoft's business foray into the cloud, will be leaving after Office 365 launches. Thompson's been with Microsoft for 21 years. He started with NT networking, moved over to Server, then Exchange, and finally led the effort to create BPOS, Microsoft's Business Productivity Online Suite -- a for-hire amalgam of Exchange, SharePoint, Live Meeting, and Lync (formerly Office Communications) that will grow up to be Office 365. The move's been in the works for a couple of months, according to Microsoft.

Rounding out the dearly or nearly departed, the ReadWriteWeb site announced that it had discovered a picture of Alek Kolcz on the Twitter employee page (hint: he's at row 26, column 11). That doesn't quite rate as a press release, much less a restraining order, but it seems entirely plausible that Alek has quietly left Redmond for the Bay Area. Alek's a computer science type, with a long list of scholarly publications. As the sole Principal Scientist at Bing, he's considered to be one of the key tech guys.

With 90,000 employees or so, Microsoft's loss of a handful of executives and techies isn't statistically significant. But the turnover among cloud-savvy senior executives -- Ozzie, Muglia, arguably Brooks, notably Thompson -- has to hurt.



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (2790)1/31/2011 6:22:16 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2955
 
How Qualcomm Is Putting Quality Into Its Stock /

By TIERNAN RAY

Barron's Technology Trader |

SATURDAY, JANUARY 29, 2011

Qualcomm, in the age of wireless communications, is looking like a solid investment. Also, Microsoft has plenty of factors now that could lift its shares.

The Dot-Com Era was an awful time for many reasons, among them obnoxious sock puppets and obnoxious stock prices.

I'm happy to report, however, that some things can be salvaged from that Gilded Age.

For example, last week, Qualcomm (ticker: QCOM), a former highflier that came crashing down in 2000 with all the rest, reported a very good fiscal first quarter and a buoyant outlook for this year.

Why am I reaching so far back in time? To make the point that Qualcomm is older and wiser, and a far better deal for investors.

The latest results suggest Qualcomm is a solid investment in the age of wireless communications evolving around us with startling intensity.

Qualcomm makes modem chips that manage the communications in cellphones and, soon, in wireless-enabled tablet computers. The company is a cornerstone of the new era of networked devices.

Back in dot-com days, when the stock reached an all-time, presplit price of $652, on the next-to-last day of trading in 1999, the shares fetched over 100 times forward earnings.

In what sure felt at the time like millennium gazing, PaineWebber famously slapped a $1,000 price target on the stock, a P/E multiple of 239 times projected earnings.

These days, at a recent $53.74, Qualcomm fetches a more modest 18 times projected earnings per share of $2.99 for the fiscal year ending this September, or 16.7 times next year's projected $3.21 EPS, depending on your flavor.

I think the stock can certainly gain another 20%. After seeing sales fall in 2009 during the recession, and turning in a lackluster 7% last fiscal year, analysts have the company bringing in as much as 30% revenue growth this year and 24% profit growth.

That adds up to a billion dollars more than analysts expected before last Wednesday's Q1 report. First quarter sales were up 25%, and earnings per share of 82 cents easily beat the average 72-cent estimate.

On the conference call with analysts, CEO Paul Jacobs, chiming in from Davos, rattled off some dazzling statistics: The number of smartphones sold around the world will rise 50% this year, to 440 million. Qualcomm's shipments of chips are supposed to rise 23% this year, to as many as 800 million units, and the more chips it sells into smartphones, the better, as those phones are more complex, bringing Qualcomm higher royalties and higher profit margin.

There are other opportunities as well. Adam Benjamin with Jefferies, wrote on Thursday that he expects Qualcomm will increasingly be able to sell a chip called "Snapdragon" into not just phones but also tablet computers.

Benjamin has a Buy rating on Qualcomm, and thinks it could be worth $68. Craig Berger, an analyst with FBR Capital Markets, has a more cautious $60 price target, but he also thinks it can outperform the market. On Thursday he wrote that Qualcomm is "returning to its historical traditions of solid revenue growth and conservative financial guidance."

At 16.7 times next year's earnings, Qualcomm's P/E is below its average in the last five years of 18.5 times. Moreover, Bloomberg numbers suggest the stock's P/E-to-growth ratio is at just 1.1, which would be below the average of 1.4 in the last two years.

With Qualcomm's earnings growth rate now being sharply ratcheted higher by the Street, I expect the stock multiple will have to expand to 21 to 22. That could put the shares in the vicinity of $66.

What could go wrong? Royalty rates could turn out to be less than the company estimates, a concern Berger mentions. And competition is certainly formidable. Nvidia (NVDA), which Barron's wrote positively about recently, is a chief competitor, with its parts inside some truly cool new devices, such as Motorola's Xoom tablet.

But competition is no reason to keep a good stock down. In more sober ways than was the case a decade ago, Qualcomm's got a shot at a huge market.

--------------

MICROSOFT IS A STOCK THAT'S MUCH harder to anticipate. It's been a dog of a stock for quite a while now, not rising at all in the last twelve months, while the Nasdaq rose 23%, and underperforming the index in the last five years by quite a wide margin. As hedge fund manager Charles Clough suggests in a story on page 39, it would help if Microsoft enhanced its dividend.

But even without that, I think Microsoft is another one that could see at least 20% appreciation from here.

The company's main growth driver for years, Windows, is going through a rocky period, while its newfangled game accessory, Kinect, just came out of nowhere, stunning the electronics industry by becoming the fastest-selling product ever during the holiday season.

On Thursday, when Microsoft (MSFT) reported fiscal second quarter earnings, the "Entertainment" division of the company reported a stunning 55% jump in revenue, largely because of Kinect.

The group that sells Windows, meantime, saw a 30% drop in revenue, which is no small thing considering it makes up 25% of sales and 40% of operating profit.

The only real disappointment was consumers, whose purchases of PCs were especially slim.

And there's no longer a recession to blame. This is a major structural shift in the market.

Microsoft's director for investor relations, Bill Koefoed, told me that fewer Netbooks were sold as individuals turned to buying…something else. What that was, he wouldn't say, but it's obvious: they were buying Apple's (AAPL) iPad. Apple last week said it sold over seven million units in the December quarter, far more than analysts expected.

So, is Microsoft toast? Not at all. They're a survivor. On top of Kinect, Microsoft saw a 24% jump in revenue at its "Business" division, which sells, among other things, Microsoft Office. Sales of Office to both consumers and businesses rose 20% in the quarter.

Once you realize that Microsoft is not going away because of a little thing like the collapse in consumer PCs, it's easy to do the math on its stock.

At approximately 12 times next fiscal year's earnings, the shares trade well below a five-year average of 15 times.

Analysts are projecting the company to make $2.51 this fiscal year ending in June. That would be 19% profit growth for Microsoft, following 24% the year before. At that rate, Microsoft's low P/E isn't consistent with its earnings growth rate.

Give the stock something more like its traditional multiple, and the shares could rise to the mid-$30s.