SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steven White who wrote (5537)11/12/1997 10:51:00 PM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
True Story
Some people moved from the area where I work to a new area.
When they came back to get some of their stuff, one of them said.
"Why is it that I can move my UNIX workstation from one place to another and it boots straight up, while my NT desktop is hosed. I guess I'm just a UNIX bigot"
Someone else moving in said " Maybe you are, but you are right.".
Both people are computer professionals.
Just a small anecdote, but I wonder how many times is this happening?
BTW, the UNIX box in question is a Sun Sparc 20 running Solaris 2.5.1.



To: Steven White who wrote (5537)11/12/1997 10:52:00 PM
From: pragat  Respond to of 64865
 
Steve:

You may want to read the November 3, 1997, article in the information week magazine: "Enterprise Edition of NT Server Falls Short". The following issues are outlined in that article:

1) Limited scalability
2) No support for failover
3) Lack of a name server for locating distributed resources
4) No support for automatic load balancing
5) Uncertainity surrounding the direction of MSMQ:Message Queue Server
6) Clustering limitations
7) Limited fault-tolerance
8) Limited support for BackOffice Suite (in a clustered environment)
9) Mandatory requirement to use certified MSCS-compliant for the servers, shared RAID, SCSI adapters, and network adapters
10)Lack of a projected release date for NT Server 5.0

If you're a good engineer, these issues certainly do matter.



To: Steven White who wrote (5537)11/13/1997 12:14:00 AM
From: gordon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 64865
 
Solaris Vs. NT standishgroup.com

Enjoy
Gordon Shen



To: Steven White who wrote (5537)11/13/1997 10:43:00 PM
From: paul  Respond to of 64865
 
Check out the E450 - it has the performance three times that of a Compaq Proliant and Hewlett Packard Netserver (hell, who are we kidding - the Intel 4 way running MS NT with compaq and HP labels slapped on). price around 14K.