SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KyrosL who wrote (155284)1/29/2011 2:56:04 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541958
 
<<<If you are in favor of taking the caps off, then you must be in favor of means testing. This is because, if you take the caps off, the "rich" will be getting even less social security, compared to their contributions. Which is ... means testing. >>>

Could you please explain that. I don't understand.



To: KyrosL who wrote (155284)1/29/2011 4:24:37 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541958
 
If you are in favor of taking the caps off, then you must be in favor of means testing. This is because, if you take the caps off, the "rich" will be getting even less social security, compared to their contributions. Which is ... means testing.

I fail to see the point. Perhaps I'm dense. Can you elaborate more.

It only means, as far as I'm concerned, that everyone contributes a flat tax worth. I don't see any means testing on the back end. Help me out.



To: KyrosL who wrote (155284)1/29/2011 6:57:36 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541958
 
That's not means testing. That's just giving someone way less than they put in. There's a lot of things you can call that, but "means testing" doesn't seem to be one of those things. At least not as means testing is defined now.