Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lew Green who wrote (1705)	11/13/1997 12:56:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

Lew: Schechter resigned? No more Hungry Lion? No more Shorty Scumbag Fund? It's kind of sad to see one of the shorts bite the dust. And I was so much hoping they would all be around when the real action starts. I would hate to miss the opportunity to say, IN YOUR FACE, SHORTY!!!!!!! In all seriousness though, your point about the timing of Chatters' IPM attacks is a good one. If, as Mr. Chatters would have us believe, his only interest is protecting the poor IPM lambs from the slaughter, he would have been warning us when the stock was going UP from $4 to $14, not after it had fallen back down to $4. Particularly not when the independent verification report is imminent. No, Chatters is a dupe for the shorts, if not one himself. And like the rest of the shorts, Chatters bet on the wrong hoss. Probably a desparation move from a guy having a hard time moving subscriptions. If he gets lucky and calls it right, look at all the attention he brings to himself. If not, he still brings a lot of attention to himself. I guess Chatters must be a follower of ex-Chicago White Sox owner Bill Veeck, who believed there is no such thing as bad publicity.

To: Lew Green who wrote (1705)	11/13/1997 12:59:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3744

"<<but what I state is that the orebody I talk about was drilled by a major American producer.>>" "This is false and distortion. When I have the time I'll pull and edit a collage of your bragadocia. " So you admit you twist and distort to make cheap points. Swell. --------------------------------------- I take it you are going to pretend to be too thick to read what is humour and what is valid claim. So I will splain it for the audience. There are all kinds of possible producers in North America which were formerly worked. I can't have worked in some and know about others? You would know this? My claim of the property being drilled is false? You know this? I would lie? My name isn't Guy Lamarche. Well skewer away. I suppose you could have used a payphone. And It would be diabolical to use your own last name. Why would you do that? Must be a co-incidence. ------------------------------- You are right on though about Naxos. No relation to IPM. But the claims are SO similar. Similar pseudo environments. Unassayable platinum. Huge values. Strange ratios of gold to platinum. Same claims of micro fine minerals. No source. Special patentable assay methods. -------------------------------- Naxos has specious management? Environmental concerns? Doyle is Prince Charming, Allred is Mother Theresa? Proximity to a canal, a power line and houses is not a concern? Take another look at the map. ---------------------------------