Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Graystone who wrote (25741)	11/13/1997 1:02:00 AM
From: barb loucks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Mr. Graystone, The emphasis is mine, the words are yours: To: james v chiappardi (20910 ) From: Graystone Thursday, May 1 1997 10:07PM EST Reply #20919 of 27539 James. I think the short activity is being fuelled by the small investors. The small investors regularily deal with small cap stocks, or stocks under $5. Bre-X moved from the stratosphere to the mud puddle and the pollywogs want to keep it there so they can make money off of it. The shorts, and the penny investor are an integral part of the market and it is a real pity that Bre-X is in this territory at all. However, keep in mind that a stock like Bre-X could put the shorts out of the money for a long long time, it has done it before. To: Jim Sanders From: Graystone Thursday, May 1 1997 10:00PM EST Reply #20916 of 27539 Jim, is that nice ? We all need to hear both sides of the story. It is like bigdude vs GOLDMAN, who is right, nobody really knows yet. DH is entitled to his opinion, like anybody else. Things that don't go over to well with me are claims that "I am in the know", such as the one DH made. Well DH, I am "in the know" when it comes to Walsh and company. Felderhof and Walsh are good men, period, they didn't scam anybody. I won't comment on de Guzman because I feel that he may play a critical part in the story we are about to hear. mikesloan said there are "NO FACTS" but I disagree, 7 holes twinned in the high grade areas should not have come back ZILCH, it should be a physical impossibility, even allowing for improper methods, they should not have had ZILCH. Salting is not only the addition of foreign material to a sample, it is the increase in reserve estimation caused by any deliberate means. The facts are clear, when the results from Freeport were on the table, the one man who could have cleared up the controversy is silenced.