Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (31943)	2/1/2011 9:11:05 PM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Wharfie, regarding "consensus" medical opinion over which you foolishly snicker. You no doubt have no idea at all about how many people with non-Hodgkins lymphoma died because of the "consensus". There are several "consensus" medical opinions with which I have disagreed over the decades and it turned out that I was right and they were wrong. So, once again, your "go with the flow of the High Priest literati" is false. As is tritely true, all progress comes from the individual single opinion which differs from the consensus. So making the argument that because an opinion is minority is ipso facto evidence that it is false, is tritely, obviously, wrong. It's amusing that so-called scientists would make the consensus argument. Which, to spell it out for you, is not to say that any wacky orange juice treatment for cancer or climate is a good idea. The consensus body count here: Message 24119968 The body count from the Global Warmist consensus will be measured in the millions. Mqurice