SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : S3 (A LONGER TERM PERSPECTIVE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TraderGreg who wrote (7843)11/13/1997 8:08:00 AM
From: Leo Francis  Respond to of 14577
 
TraderGreg, You qualify as a plaintiff. Class actions may go after personal assets of the officers, the closest thing to "jail time" in cases like these. Butt(no spelling error-g-) if successful, they may still feel it up the ---!

Contact one of the lead attorneys and ask a bunch of questions.

Good Trading, and Litigating, LF

Sid, great joke, thanks.



To: TraderGreg who wrote (7843)11/13/1997 8:11:00 AM
From: mark doubiago  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14577
 
Depending on which lawsuit, most anyone who bought shares in the 96 - 97 time frame. The ones that go back to 96 probably think that something funny has been going on for the last 2 years. From my previous experience as a member of a class action suit, I got 5% of my money back, hardy worth the trip to the bank to deposit the check. I would be overwhelmed to get back 25 - 50%. Don't count on it though.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News