SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (599879)2/4/2011 2:12:19 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570418
 
Whenever I read these silly statements with percentages in them that first thing that pops to my mind is that there are two ways to get to the 80% level--add more clean energy or reduce the total. If we have 80% of our electricity from clean energy in 2035, it may mean that practically the only electricity left in 2035 is hydroelectric from way back when. The statement may be true, but the implication we get from understanding the hype now may be way off.

Gail the Actuary
ourfiniteworld.com



To: TimF who wrote (599879)2/4/2011 6:40:55 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570418
 
Costs due to what???



To: TimF who wrote (599879)2/4/2011 7:14:25 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570418
 
What is the upside to releasing more and more CO2 into the atmosphere??? Will it have any environmental effect at all?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News