SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (4908)2/5/2011 10:31:36 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 119362
 
dailyfinance.com



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (4908)2/5/2011 10:39:50 PM
From: Webster Groves  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 119362
 
The taxpayers pick up the tab only because Fanny was the patsy.
Without a designated bag-holder, the banks could not have flipped the loans.
The question to ask is why was Fanny buying loans of dubious value.
Not the fault of the borrower. The bank could have demanded collateral as in the old days, but the patsy made the deal sweeter,
and Fannie didn't care because its execs got a cut on cash-flow (called bonuses).

wg



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (4908)2/5/2011 11:24:12 PM
From: Stefan2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 119362
 
If you care you would start with the bankers first! They had the purse and were enablers, everything else just followed. Bankers needed a bigger casino to make that winning last bet and they got it. Blaming anyone else is a distraction.
I know they lied on application, but who gave them the money? Whose responsibility was to checked the paperwork? Why they did not do their due diligence? (accident? I don’t think so)Who paid backed their bonuses back to the taxpayer on the fraud they have committed?
All is well no they say, banks paid back so now we can have free market again.
People are just dumb with very short memory and the MAN knows it!