SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (32099)2/6/2011 12:51:52 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
Orally isn't one of my own. He's like the broken clock that is right twice a day, and this is one of them.

Actually, the evidence for AGW is about as strong as it gets, from the first suspicions of Fourier-> Tyndall proving the GHGs absorbed heat -> Arrhenius postulating the Greenhouse effect and trying to calculate CO2 sensitivity thru the Reville-Keeling curve thru isotope studies to the current observations and measurements.
None of this evidence, however, appears in the Bible.



To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (32099)2/6/2011 11:05:08 AM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36917
 
>The evidence of AGW is very weak

There's where your faith lies. You ignore the strong evidence and call it "weak", out of your strong faith.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News