To: d[-_-]b who wrote (2256 ) 2/9/2011 9:42:24 PM From: joseffy Respond to of 4326 Enviro's Claim: Emissions control rules to create 1.4 million new jobs (New EPA Regs-New Costs) Penn Energy On-Line Reports 02-08-2011 | RACookPE1978 Report: Emissions control rules to create 1.4 million new jobs Emissions control rules being proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will provide economic benefits and jobs across much of the U.S. in the next five years, according to a new report from Ceres, a network of investors and environmental organizations. The report found that the power sector will invest almost $200 billion total in capital improvements over the next five years. Total employment created by these capital investments is estimated at 1.46 million jobs, or about 290,000 jobs on average in each of the next five years. Among the states that will see the biggest job gains from this construction activity are Virginia, Tennessee, Illinois, North Carolina and Indiana. The study also finds that permanent operation and maintenance (O&M) jobs associated with pollution control installations and new generation construction will be created in all states. Although some O&M jobs will be lost because of projected retirement of older, less efficient coal plants, these losses will be offset by new O&M jobs, resulting in an approximately 4,200 net job gain across the 36 states studied. The new report evaluates job impacts under two Clean Air Act rules expected to be finalized in 2011: the Clean Air Transport Rule, and the Utility MACT rule. ---------------------------------------------------------------To download a copy of the report, visit ceres.org . ____________________________________________________________ Notice that this "study" - funded for and by the EPA and the environmental groups to "justify" the (very real) job losses and economic pain as energy costs are raised regionally to pay for these UNNEEDED changes in the emission control systems of existing power plants itself is propaganda tool. This 200 billion in "unneeded" new construction for unneeded new emission systems?