SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Solon who wrote (13413)2/6/2011 3:49:30 PM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
I said I had never heard of the phrase and did a "quick search on goggle" only to find nothing with that specific phrase came up. The fact that you had to do an advanced search just proves my point, it's neither common or obvious. OTOH, Running your mouth (which is all you ever do) google.ca
is a common and obvious phrase. Look at how many direct references there are for it compared to the stupid obscure term that you used.

<<<You support the "right" for a man to take a living child's head in his hands only to thrust a pair of scissors into it's brain>>>

"I support the RIGHT to legal abortions for women."

Thanks for proving my point. What I described is LEGAL so you do support it! It's also one of the most repugnant and evil things that any Human being could do to another. Why are you arguing that you don't support it, when IN FACT YOU DO? (You pathetic lying little despicable MORON!)




To: Solon who wrote (13413)2/6/2011 4:09:22 PM
From: Jacques Chitte1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
I ran the search just for grins, after placing "running your head" in quotation marks in order to limit the search to the contiguous phrase.
I found 178 hits.
Most involved the colloquialism "running your head into a brick wall". One had someone running his head under a shower. Most of the rest had punctuation marks in the phrase, like a treatise on posture during "running. Your head" ...

Ironically, the first reference to the phrase as a phrase was this:

Message 27147340