Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (600114)	2/8/2011 4:13:42 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 1583405

but I believe they would have less access to them Just like drug prohibition has caused people to have little access to drugs? Oh wait... and they would be less likely to feel they have to meet force with like force There concern is not so much meeting force with force, as trying to have force on their side, while to the extent possible avoiding it from the other side. If their targets are unarmed it doesn't give them any incentive to disarm themselves, they would just remain armed and use the advantage they get from being able to apply deadly force to unarmed victims.