Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: douglas hicks who wrote (17535)	11/13/1997 9:36:00 AM
From: lavalamp	Respond to of 55532

Doug, I would like to see such a debate. I would also like the real players to unmask themselves so it is easier to understand a lot of the prior posts. Seems some questions that could easily be answered in public by them would clear this all up rapidly. BTW: do you think Morgan is really posting on SI under an alias?

To: douglas hicks who wrote (17535)	11/13/1997 9:38:00 AM
From: Jeff Harrington	Respond to of 55532

Doug, please don't take this the wrong way, but can you give it up? This is not a debatable issue. There are facts. Period. Maybe not all the facts some may need, but there are facts nonetheless. What facts, exactly are you concerned with that you wished debated? Why not just call the CEO?

To: douglas hicks who wrote (17535)	11/13/1997 9:43:00 AM
From: Rashid Garuba	Respond to of 55532

Douglas, This is not a political campaign where the subjective is of useful influence. The "debate" has been going on here since August. You choose whom you want to beleive, or, if none, then stay out of the stock. Enough useless mud flies around here already. Rashid

To: douglas hicks who wrote (17535)	11/13/1997 9:43:00 AM
From: Typhoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Douglas, please excuse my ignorance for not understanding what you are saying. I have yet to see any officer of any company post online on the thread devoted to his/her company. It's just not done. I'm not sure of all the reasons, but I believe it is because of the potential for legal or regulatory complications. Heck, I even saw the investor relations guy for one stock post on SI, but he completely avoided the thread for the company he works for. Therefore, I don't think we will, or can even logically expect, that any RMIL officers would participate in an online debate. As for the short sellers, I think we've heard plenty of what they have to say. They aren't officers of RMIL. They're officers of other companies. Somehow, the system is screwed up, IMO, when uncovered short sellers are protected and can trash online, but the officers of the company under attack have to remain silent.