Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Mobile Computing - OSs & Manufacturers UNMODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (2241)	2/8/2011 12:22:20 PM
From: sylvester80	Respond to of 3170

Message 27151758

To: Road Walker who wrote (2241)	2/8/2011 12:30:34 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3170

Piper: Android to become billion dollar business in 2011 Posted by Seth Weintraub February 8, 2011 11:55 AM tech.fortune.cnn.com Source: Piper, Click to enlarge It is all in the accounting. When you have two separate internal businesses, mobile and advertising, who do you give credit to when money is made in mobile advertising? Do you give full credit to the mobile business and take the revenue out of the advertising wing? Or, do you split it up between the two with some arbitrary percentage allotted to each? Google (GOOG) and its analysts are stuck in that conundrum. To that end, Piper Jaffay's Gene Munster thinks they've worked out some sort of basis for allotting money to their mobile operating system and has assigned Android a dollar amount per Android phone of $5.90 this year and $9.85 next year. We believe Android could provide over $1 billion in revenue from advertising to Google in 2012. We believe that Android generated $5.90 per user in mobile advertising in 2010 and expect ARPU to increase to $9.85 in 2012. In comparison, Google search generated $18.85 per user and Google advertising in total generated $25.77. Additionally, we expect Google's revamped Android Market will enable users to download apps on Android more easily and could increase monetization per user from in-app advertising over the next two years. We maintain our Overweight rating on GOOG. Will/would Google make that much money from a Symbian phone or iOS device that also used Google services? Google CEO Eric Schmidt has said they do make significant money on competing platforms on numerous occasions. However, if those phones were feature phones or Windows Mobile phones, Google wouldn't likely make as much per device. However, Munster thinks that Eric Schmidt's hypothesis of monetizing $10/user/year is rapidly approaching... We believe Google is well on its way to having users pay $10 a year via advertising on Android. Based on Google's quoted $1 billion mobile run rate (mobile advertising), we believe Google generated $850 million in total on mobile in 2010. Even approaching $10, the average revenue per user (ARPU) for mobile devices is still significantly below a desktop OS user's (see graph above), according to Piper's research. As we noted, we believe Google's ARPU on Android was $5.90 in 2010. We believe Google's average revenue per search user was $18.85 in 2010 and average revenue per user for Google's advertising businesses in total was $25.77 in 2010 Piper notes that with the recent improvements to the Android Market, especially in-app purchases, Google stands to make more money directly from apps. Google is more focused, and will continue to see more revenue from in-app advertising, which it heavily invested in with its $600 million Admob purchase. But, back to the accounting of the Android OS: To me, Android is still a defensive play. Apple (AAPL) was clearly planning on getting into mobile advertising when it made an offer to buy Admob. While Apple's advertising ramp-up is slow in comparison to Google's, it is clear that Apple is in ads for the long haul. Microsoft (MSFT) clearly has its own Bing ambitions. Google simply couldn't concede the mobile advertising market to its competition. That is why Android exists. So, it may make more sense to characterize Google's mobile OS as a feature or an enabler of its advertising empire, something of a platform to make sure people continue to use its services without being blocked by competitors. On the other hand, shareholders want to see a return on the Android investments, so figures like these exist. There you go.

To: Road Walker who wrote (2241)	2/8/2011 1:22:41 PM
From: sylvester80	Respond to of 3170

ANDROID BREAKS YET ANOTHER RECORD: Android Browser Passes iPhone Safari In Web Browsing Share Kurt Bakke in Business on February 08 conceivablytech.com The default Android has become more popular on the Internet than iPhone’s Safari in North America, according to StatCounter. The Android browser surpassed the iPhone browser for the first time in January, with a share of 24.25%, compared to 23.94% of the iPhone. Android is still on a path of growth, while the StatCounter data indicates that the iPhone has stabilized and trapped in flat growth. However, even more revealing is the nose dive of the Blackberry platform. RIM’s smartphone browser surrendered almost four points of share in January and landed at 25.85%. If the trend continues, the default Android browser will become the most popular smartphone browser this month. RIM’s default Blackberry browser has held that position since May 2010 when it surpassed the iPhone. The iPhone’s Safari topped out at more than 38% in October 2009. Globally, Opera still has the lead, followed by Safari. The Blackberry browser dropped from the second spot to fourth, behind Nokia, and is about to be surpassed by Android in this chart as well. As there are multiple browsers available for each smartphone platform, the implications for smartphone presence on the web are limited. According to StatCounter, iOS (which includes all iOS devices, including the iPhone, iPad and iPod touch) is leading and has even improved its share in January from 35.03% to 36.42%. Blackberry saw a drop from 29.92% to 26.05%, which is in close range to Android. Google’s platform jumped from 23.52% to 24.56%. Worldwide, Symbian is still the dominant platform on mobile devices on the web, with a share just north of 30.25%. iOS follows with 25.02%, Blackberry OS with 15.03% and Android with 14.61%. A recent Comscore market update confirms the sharp drop for the Blackberry. In the December 2010 quarter, Blackberry accounted for only 31.6% of smartphone platform share in the U.S., down from 37.3% in the preceding quarter. Android was up from 21.4$ to 28.7%, while the iPhone climbed from 24.3% to 25.0%.