SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (99583)2/8/2011 2:02:01 PM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224747
 
There is no presumption of constitutionality in the appeal of the Florida Courts decision. That is the argument and I see you attempt to deflect it.

You are of course wrong.

It wopuld be opposite of course in appeals of the courts decisions where it was constitutional.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (99583)2/8/2011 2:15:06 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224747
 
kenny..."One District Court decision does not make the bill unconstitutional. It remains the law of the land."...

So, are all laws in USA constitutional? or are some maybe unconstitutional but still are laws?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (99583)2/8/2011 2:30:04 PM
From: Bill6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224747
 
One District Court decision does not make the bill unconstitutional. It remains the law of the land.

Where did you get your law degree?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (99583)2/8/2011 5:30:32 PM
From: jlallen5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224747
 
It remains the law of the land despite a finding of unconstitutionality by the Federal District Court in FL?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News