Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: alanrs who wrote (5458)	2/9/2011 12:55:38 PM
From: deeno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 119362

A bit one sided, but i enjoyed it. The video comes down to ... I'm a bank robber and you colluded with me. "the Who is worse" scenerio is entertaining, but irrelvant to my orginal comment to the objectional line that your post alludes to. The home owner was fraudulent and should be prosecuted. Assuming the Mortgage broker was a conspiritor he should be in the adjoining cell. To prosecute the conspiritor instead of the perpatrator is an outrageous miscarriage of justice. Since its probably politically impossible to indict all the "dead beat" buyers and toss them all in jail, it seems unreasonable you would hold any conspritors to a different set of laws. I objected to the comment that somehow criminals should avoid prosection becasue "someone else" let them do it. I did not ever claim that either, one party was worse then the other, or that the banksters were all clean as a whistle. If you want someone in jail start with the robber then go after the conspiritors. Otherwise I guess you should leave them all alone.