SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (32307)2/12/2011 12:35:52 AM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36921
 
>i'm against pollution

LOL, like hell you are. Anyways GAC polishing of effluent wastewater can remove estrogens and other organic compounds. But it costs. I'm sure, you, the rabid environmentalist you are, would support spending the money. Just like I'm SURE that you support spending money for the conversion of coal fired stations into cleaner methods. Heck I support the nuclear option as a stopgap measure.



To: longnshort who wrote (32307)2/12/2011 1:02:32 AM
From: Land Shark  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 36921
 
You should do some more research before you post your political garbage:

Don't Blame the Pill
pubs.acs.org

BC Pills are a very small contributor to estrogen pollution. I guess you've now changed your position on the Pill?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News