SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (600611)2/13/2011 4:56:44 PM
From: Tenchusatsu3 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1571004
 
Bad news Ted. A recent study concluded that the weather isn't getting more extreme:

online.wsj.com

> As it happens, the project's initial findings, published last month, show no evidence of an intensifying weather trend. "In the climate models, the extremes get more extreme as we move into a doubled CO2 world in 100 years," atmospheric scientist Gilbert Compo, one of the researchers on the project, tells me from his office at the University of Colorado, Boulder. "So we were surprised that none of the three major indices of climate variability that we used show a trend of increased circulation going back to 1871."

Tenchusatsu



To: tejek who wrote (600611)2/15/2011 7:34:27 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571004
 
They have the equipment for the smaller storms. Its the bigger storms that happen every 6 years where they fall short.

Some of the "smaller storms" are barely smaller. I very much doubt their performance is nearly as binary as you represent it.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News