Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (411153)	2/16/2011 3:56:43 PM
From: Geoff Altman	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793639

IMO this isn't a debatable point. If the guy had diplomatic immunity it doesn't matter if he shot in self defense or not, immunity is immunity, there is no gray area here. As soon as the Paks decided to treat this guy as a common criminal Clinton should have demanded his release. If the Paks didn't comply then notify them that we'll suspended all payments to them. If they still won't release him then screw the Paks, give the money that would have gone to them,,,,,TO INDIA. Think that would piss them off?...<g> BTW, isn't arresting someone with diplomatic immunity akin to flying across a ships bow? I'm sick of the kitt clove treatments that we give these Islamic countries.....