Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (13799)	2/20/2011 10:52:13 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

You were asked 3 simple questions in order to clarify an ongoing difference of opinion and presentation. 99.9% of your posts are ad hominem attacks. Not only are your attacks argumentum ad hominem...but they are also malicious and entirely untrue. I am correctly stating that the "hate-filled" bigot is you. Since you have said on SI that you reside in Canada, I am using the CHRA as a benchmark to determine the level of bigotry which can reasonably be assigned to either of us. I stated my values openly in asking those questions so that there could be no suggestion of unfair play. I wanted everything to be fair, open, decent, and above board to facilitate a true resolution of these disparate claims of bigotry and character. Whether or not you are a bigot can be easily answered by a truthful exposition of your values and whether or not they involve an antagonism toward human rights and freedoms. Your obsession with definitions of "boy" and so forth seem to be begging clarification of what I support. The CHRA supports the right to voluntary sexual activity between people of age 15 and over. However, anal sex is not supported by the act until the age of 18. Therefore, I can clarify for you that I DO NOT support the right to anal intercourse before the age of 18 years of age. My original statement explicitly stated I supported the "rights of any two competent people of legal age to engage in any sexual activity which seems good (and wonderful) to them! So that statement stands as unaltered. I have merely added some unnecessary clarification to it in order to assist your understanding which you seem to be struggling with. Here (once again) are my three answers. Please prove to this thread that I am wrong in calling you a hate-filled superstitious monstrous irrational BIGOT. YES. I support the CHRA. I support the rights of any two competent people of legal age to engage in any sexual activity which seems good (and wonderful) to them! NO. I do not believe that two bears mauled and killed 42 little boys and girls while they frolicked and gamboled at play (the little children, I mean). I think that is silly and mythic. NO. I don’t believe such a vicious murder could possibly be characterized as either “Just” or “Good”. I would call such murderous activity Monstrous, Evil, and Uncivilized. Message 27182127