Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MythMan who wrote (413640)	2/21/2011 12:52:17 PM
From: Horgad	Respond to of 436258

Well no, but its less a matter of whether or not he is responsible and more a matter of who believes he responsible. I think if oil was rising for no apparent reason, he would get more pressure to do something about it. But now he that he has an out, he might be able to just let it run and continue his easy money, prop the stock market ways. I am sure that was also his hope when he recently tried to deflect the causes of food inflation away from himself. But I am not sure anybody bought into that story. However, the current oil story looks more believable and might be a better sell. Blame the Middle-east unrest for oil prices then blame oil for food prices and keep on printing.