Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (13828)	2/21/2011 4:52:58 PM
From: Jacques Chitte	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

Laying down of sediment is only part of the story. The channeled scablands are the result of mass removal of terrain perhaps twelve thousand years ago, by much less water than a planetwide flood would need. Covering the continents in thousands of feet of water, allowing that water to leave heaven-knows-where, all in a geologic eyeblink - it would leave massive scars. Landlocked arid basins like the Takla Makan desert should be colossal salt lakes... or salt pans. "I wouldn't use it as a foil against inerrancy." That's OK; I took the job. (grin) Using the Biblical scholarly community's own definitions of inerrancy v. infallibility, the flood makes a compelling case imo. Inerrancy requires a global flood. The land, using the elements of geography and geology, excludes such an event. The only fallback I see is the weaker form: infallibility.