Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (13867)	2/22/2011 8:50:48 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

"Because you didn’t give a link! And then you followed it with a sentence that was obviously crafted to appear as something I said!!" Dear passionate supporter of anal sex between grown men and adolescent boys. Here is my sentence in full with a link <<<"It's Solon who named himself after a man who was in all likelihood a Pederast and Solon who refuses to condemn Pederasty "as long as it's legal" and no one gets "hurt". As if a piece of paper and an abundance of lube somehow makes an older man grooming a boy for anal sex morally acceptable.">>> Message 27177758 Here is YOUR response, with a link. ....................... <<<“An abundance of lube somehow makes an older man grooming a boy for anal sex morally acceptable. “>>> "If the choice is mutual, it is FINE!" siliconinvestor.com ........................................ If you notice the space that YOU left between the quotation mark at the end of my sentence you will see that I simply cut and pasted it from YOUR response. failing to distinguish my sentence with the usual brackets was simply an oversight. You are stuck with YOUR response which was that older men grooming boys for anal sex IS morally acceptable. "If the choice is mutual, it is FINE!" Wow. it's "FINE!"? In fact all caps with an exclamation mark, "FINE!"? Uh, OK Pedolon. Nice of you to come out of the kid's room long enough for a response.