SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: joseffy who wrote (304434)2/22/2011 9:02:15 PM
From: ValueproRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
"...but there is a principle involved - and a 40-year debt to be paid. The programs that were unceremoniously run off of many of America’s elite campuses need to be reinstated to make the point not only that they have the right to be there but that they belong there."

Yep, and a lot of these schools were federal Land Grant Institutions whose states were granted land and money for these schools. Part of the grant required these schools to offer ROTC, though ROTC was never limited to Land Grant schools (LGS). So, when many of the LGS stopped offering ROTC, I was disappointed that there were no repercussions, such as ending research grants, and insured student loan programs.

Here's a list of LGSs, if anyone cares to peruse it.

en.wikipedia.org

Anyway, I'm pleased that when my son went off to college wanting to participate in ROTC, it was available for him. Moreover, he earned an ROTC scholarship that paid for his last two years of school, saving me a lot money (which I gave him at his commissioning ceremony). He's coming up on 3 years on active duty now, a Captain with plans toward embassy duty.

I'm biased, but I think a campus without ROTC can't be "fair and balanced". Certainly many numbers of them are not the pillars of tolerance and diversity - examples to the rest of the country - they are supposed be, and once were.