Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: locogringo who wrote (100443)	2/23/2011 6:34:00 PM
From: CF Rebel	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224724

As previous Commerce Clause cases have all involved physical activity, as opposed to mental activity, i.e. decision-making, there is little judicial guidance on whether the latter falls within Congress's power... So this judge now sets a precedent for mental activity becoming a regulatable activity. Who cannot imagine whacko libs applying this precedent to criminal law where thinking bad things of someone qualifies as criminal activity? There are plenty of shrinks who could coax such admissions from subjects. Why I could be incarcerated for what I'm now thinking about this judge. Come and get me, all you lab coats and robes! CF Rebel