Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (1744)	11/13/1997 4:42:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

Chatters, <<Why are all these desert dirts so far apart and in different geology that is not even fault realted?>> You don't have a clue, do you? maxamgold.com Don't you think you should just stick with the things you know and stop spewing out the garbage you don't? NEXT

To: E. Charters who wrote (1744)	11/13/1997 5:37:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

Mr. Charters: I was not suggesting you spend $25,000 to do a proper due dilligence of Bre-X. You might, however, have taken the trouble of reading the fine print of the Kilborn report (the part where they said they did NOT do COC) prior to informing your shareholders, "Bre-X has an orebody." "I would suggest since there are some very good private investigators in that area that you hire them and go at it from the angle of what they might be hiding." Now why the heck would I do that? If I thought they were hiding something I would simply sell the stock.