Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hardrocker who wrote (5902)	11/13/1997 5:22:00 PM
From: Mighty_Mezz	Respond to of 31646

Isn't the The 4% dilution still a rumor at this point? Sell on rumor, buy on news? ggg Chart's turned ugly, but we all know TA is often wrong, so I patiently wait for fabulous news.

To: Hardrocker who wrote (5902)	11/13/1997 5:23:00 PM
From: Zebra 365	Respond to of 31646

Note from AON on the Fool Board Thought this favorable comment should be shared here, highlights are mine, otherwise verbatim: Subject: Re: New kind on the embedded chip block... Date: Thu, Nov 13, 1997 16:52 EST From: MFlet Message-id: <19971113215201.QAA08313@ladder01.news.aol.com> <<Besides tpro has essentially been certified by AON Risk Assessment to address the factory.<< Although I was not part of the team that considered who should be a part of the AON sponsered ARM2000 (AON Risk Management 2000) program, I am familiar with the program. I am sure that there is no "certification" by AON involved. Rather members of the Project do their own thing as part of an overall comprehensive approach to the Y2K problem. I would not think that AON would want to take on the liabilities inherent in any "certification" process. Tpro is, to my uncertain knowledge, the only vendor out there that is widely recognized to be competent in working the Factory floor. Their market is, and because of the increasingly difficult employment market for qualified engineers,and has to be limited to the largest manufacturers. Their services can go for as high as $800,000 for one site (admittedly a large one). Large companies are beginning to triage their operations for Y2K compliance work. All this bodes well for the short term work load and profits of Y2K professional remediation companies. It is estimated that 30% of the work on the Y2K problem will be achieved AFTER 1/1/2000! so there will be a continuing revenue stream after this date. Long term investors should be cautious however as to the viability of Y2K firms into the next century. Make sure that they will have products to sell to the marketplace after the mess is solved! Milton Fletcher AON Risk Services Los Angeles Hardrocker, Is a Zebra a white horse with black stripes or....? Just picked a name that would show I'm niether bull nor bear. Zebra