SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)2/28/2011 3:06:40 PM
From: TideGlider7 Recommendations  Respond to of 224748
 
Rasmussen polls were proven to be the most accurate political polls.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)2/28/2011 3:15:26 PM
From: JakeStraw7 Recommendations  Respond to of 224748
 
Yeah Kenneth maybe I should start being a myopic, ignorant partisan lemming like you and not read, or pay attention to anything that differs from my opinion.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)2/28/2011 3:24:42 PM
From: locogringo7 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
Forget the polls, how 'bout some FACTS

Obama's economy heads further south

Fannie Mae, the now government owned mortgage finance company, has posted a loss of $2.4 Billion for the 4th Quarter of 2010. They have also requested another $2.6 Billion in aid from the Federal Government.

The general public has figured out that these folks do not have a clue on how to fix the nation's problems while being told the economy is on the mend and headed in the right direction. Until confidence begins a major rebound there will be no improvement in the real estate market or the economy as a whole. It is very difficult to believe that will happen with the current people in charge.

americanthinker.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)2/28/2011 3:30:32 PM
From: tonto6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
Are you speaking from experience? (s)

Jake, reading those Rasmussen polls will rot your brain as will reading Investors Business Daily.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)2/28/2011 4:03:31 PM
From: chartseer2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224748
 
Oh bummer! One deep water drilling permit granted for the Gulf of Mexico. Brilliant Barry says he will permit one deep water drilling permit to be issued for each $100.00 the price of oil increases. That sounds reasonable.

citizen chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)2/28/2011 4:09:23 PM
From: chartseer1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224748
 
"Democracy and freedom are anathema to Islam and the Shariah."

citizen chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)2/28/2011 4:40:32 PM
From: chartseer1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224748
 
Brilliant Barry asks GOP Governors to not vilify public service union goons. He says many of these goons are his friends and neighbors from Chicago.

citizen chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)3/1/2011 12:24:28 AM
From: Hope Praytochange  Respond to of 224748
 
He would hang out on a metal stool at Bowbarr, a short walk from the environmentally friendly condominium complex where he moved after details of an extramarital affair sent him from the family home.

He would swing into Crook’s Corner, a legendary Southern restaurant, for an order of fried oysters to go, talking to anyone around and looking like the polished but approachable Democratic presidential candidate he once was.

After his estranged wife, Elizabeth Edwards, died of cancer in early December, the chef at Crook’s Corner, Bill Smith, would slip in an extra dessert for their children.

“We all just feel for him, no matter what he’s done,” Mr. Smith said. “And you know there is more to come.”

That “more” is the possibility that a federal grand jury in Raleigh could soon hand up an indictment against him in a case centering on campaign finance practices.

One issue is whether Mr. Edwards knew that some of the millions of dollars given by at least two wealthy donors was being used to help support — and hide, some contend — Rielle Hunter, the campaign videographer with whom he had a prolonged affair, and the daughter they conceived.

The money used to support Ms. Hunter could be considered campaign contributions if prosecutors can show that Mr. Edwards helped orchestrate donations for that purpose, or that he knew the money would be used to keep the affair hidden so it would not hurt his 2008 presidential candidacy.

George Holding, the United States attorney in Raleigh, who was appointed by President George W. Bush, as well as a Justice Department lawyer and agents from the F.B.I. and the Internal Revenue Service are looking at a number of campaign accounts and the records of a nonprofit group connected to Mr. Edwards, according to people who have been subpoenaed and others who have knowledge of the case.

“They have the bank records for all the accounts, and they have been through them,” said Joe Sinsheimer, a former Democratic political strategist who has become a respected political watchdog in Raleigh. “Part of it is this whole financial maze.” Mr. Sinsheimer has not been subpoenaed.

Those who have been subpoenaed include dozens of former campaign workers, top aides, friends and Ms. Hunter. Investigators have also interviewed Rachel Mellon, 100, a reclusive banking heiress known as Bunny who may have given as much as $6 million to the Edwards operation, and several of her relatives.

A highly placed former campaign worker who testified late last fall said in an interview that he was pressed about Mr. Edwards’s understanding of the campaign’s finances and was asked “lots of questions about sex.”

Wade Smith, a lawyer for Mr. Edwards, did not return calls requesting an interview. But he has publicly denied any wrongdoing by his client.

Keeping track of who walks in and out of the courthouse and the number of subpoenas issued has become a popular pastime. The subpoenas have piled up to such a degree that they have become the subject of jokes about insider status in certain circles.

“I’m still waiting for mine — I feel like a nobody,” said Bill Ferris, a history professor at the University of North Carolina who was part of a literary event last weekend where the subject of Mr. Edwards made for easy conversation.

Although a recent increase in testimony has fueled talk that an indictment might be coming soon, such speculation has risen and fallen during the nearly two years the grand jury has been investigating.

The Justice Department does not comment on pending investigations, and it is certainly possible that no charges will be filed or that the charges will be misdemeanors.

Campaign finance cases are difficult to prosecute. Money flows in and out of a number of accounts with speed and fluidity, and several people can be responsible for various parts of financing a single political race. And in this case, there appears to be no single, specific event for prosecutors to hang a case on.

“They are going to throw the whole sordid story out there and let it stand as whole,” Mr. Sinsheimer said.

Mr. Edwards also is tangled in a civil suit brought by Ms. Hunter against Andrew Young, the campaign worker who once covered for his boss by claiming paternity of the couple’s child. He later turned on Mr. Edwards and wrote a tell-all book.

Ms. Hunter is trying to get back a video reportedly showing her and Mr. Edwards having sex and other photographs of Mr. Edwards and the couple’s daughter, Frances Quinn. She claims that Mr. Young took them from belongings she left behind in a house he was renting and used them to help secure media deals.

Mr. Edwards testified in a deposition for that case in February, according to published reports. The trial was scheduled to start on Monday but has been postponed until October. The judge in the case, Carl R. Fox of North Carolina Superior Court, has told witnesses for both sides that if they discuss the case with the press, they could be jailed for contempt.

If Mr. Edwards is charged in the federal case, he could take a number of tacks, say people connected to the case. Striking a deal might be the best option if the charges are misdemeanors. If he faces felony charges, many believe that Mr. Edwards, known as an exceptionally good trial lawyer who is protective of his law degree, would fight them.

But that could be even more damaging to his reputation.

“If it went to trial, the portrait of John Edwards that America has today would be way worse,” Mr. Sinsheimer said.

While Mr. Edwards waits for word from the grand jury, he has moved back into the family house on a 102-acre compound just south of Chapel Hill. Family friends say he is busy learning how to be a single parent to his younger children, Emma Claire, 12, and Jack, 10, and is working on causes important to the family, including the Wade Edwards Foundation, which finances a free after-school learning lab for high school students.

It was created to honor Mr. and Mrs. Edwards’s eldest child, who was killed in a car accident as a teenager in 1996. Mr. Edwards is the board chairman, and his eldest daughter, Catharine, 28, is a member. She is also in charge of her mother’s trust, according to a five-page will. In it, Mrs. Edwards did not mention Mr. Edwards.

For their part, Chapel Hill residents who have watched the spectacular rise and fall of their neighbor are struggling to bring him back into the fold.

“This is a very open town,” said Katharine Walton, who moved to Chapel Hill in 1994. “People understand human nature and the foibles and the fall. They are not that judgmental at all. But it is still hard to reconcile what he did.”



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)3/1/2011 9:48:14 AM
From: Ann Corrigan6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
conservatives should focus less on finding gimmick candidates to be used as pawns in the rigged game of demographic chess, and instead divert their concentration to the more important purpose of finding an electable, knowledgeable candidate that can confidently articulate the complexities of conservatism and its marked superiority to the far-left liberalism of the Obama administration.

americanthinker.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)3/1/2011 11:31:49 AM
From: lorne7 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
ken...This type of dictator/commie type of politics that hussein obama appears to favor is not something new to the democratic part of the USA, Make a person wonder how in hell can these kinds of people keep getting elected and how in hell can there be so many people like you around to ellect them...do you like being controlled ...need to be controlled....absolutely?

Ted Kennedy Arranged to 'Rent' Brothel in Latin America, '61 Memo Says

Published February 28, 2011
| FoxNews.com
foxnews.com

The late Sen. Ted Kennedy arranged to "rent" a brothel for a night while on a visit to Chile and other Latin American countries decades ago, according to a 1961 State Department memo obtained and published by the watchdog group Judicial Watch.

Judicial Watch released several documents said to be from Kennedy's FBI file. The group said it obtained a cleaner copy of the State Department memo after a mostly redacted version was made public earlier.

The Dec. 28, 1961, memo described a tour of several Latin American countries Kennedy made while he was an assistant prosecutor with Suffolk County, Mass.

Traveling with a professor, Kennedy "insisted on interviewing 'the angry young men' of the country," according to the memo. This included "communists and others who had left-wing views."

The memo said that during Kennedy's stop in Santiago, "he made arrangements to 'rent' a brothel for an entire night." The memo said Kennedy allegedly "invited one of the Embassy chauffeurs to participate in the night's activities."

The memo suggested other officials had run-ins with Kennedy on the trip. It said that in Mexico, Ambassador Mann -- presumably longtime State Department diplomat Thomas Mann -- pushed back when Kennedy wanted to invite "certain left-wingers" to the embassy residence for interviews.

"Mann took the strong position that he would not invite such people and stated that if any such interviews were to be conducted, all arrangements should be made by Kennedy himself," the memo said.

A State Department official in Lima said Kennedy "made similar requests" in Peru.

Kennedy, who went on to represent Massachusetts as one of the longest-serving U.S. senators in history, died in August 2009 after a battle with brain cancer.

The documents obtained by Judicial Watch also include a July 1969 FBI memo detailing a threatening letter Kennedy apparently received earlier that month. The two authors of the letter claimed they'd accepted $20,000 a piece "to bump your nasty ... off." An obscenity, one of many in the note, was redacted. The letter went on to repeatedly threaten Kennedy's life. According to the memo, the individuals who wrote the note were stationed at the San Diego Marine Corps Recruit Depot and had already been "confined to the brig on other charges." The case was referred to "military authorities."

Also included in the file was a 1963 memo, first published by Judicial Watch in September, that described an effort by Kennedy and brother Robert, the attorney general, to secure a visa for Katalin Karady, a "former Hungarian actress of unsavory reputation." The memo detailed a host of allegations against Karady, including suspicion she was a "communist collaborator," a prostitute and the fiancee of a Hungarian Nazi operative during World War II. The former actress was living in Brazil at the time and denied communist and Nazi connections. After intervention from the Kennedy brothers, she received a visa.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (100723)3/1/2011 11:59:06 AM
From: locogringo8 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
For 50 Straight Weeks, the Majority Has Supported Repeal

For 50 consecutive weeks, Rasmussen’s poll of likely voters has been asking Americans whether (and how strongly) they support or oppose the repeal of Obamacare. Fifty times in fifty weeks, the majority of Americans have said that they support repeal. In 49 of those 50 weeks, Americans have supported repeal by double-digits margins. It’s no small feat to find something that a majority of Americans can agree upon for fifty weeks in a row — and almost always by double-digit margins. The average tally across those fifty weeks has been 56 percent in favor of repeal and 38 percent opposed. Across the five most recent weeks, the average has been exactly the same: 56 percent in favor of repeal, 38 percent opposed.

weeklystandard.com