SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Post-Crash Index-Moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (9432)3/1/2011 2:20:19 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 119358
 
yes, any improvement is good ... I still think there are many areas in mfring where we should be able to compete. From what I hear from folks that visit plants in Germany -- the mindset on quality and investment in capital goods toward better production is much more "long-sighted."



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (9432)3/8/2011 12:28:21 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 119358
 
Roubini Sees Double Dip for Advanced States If Oil Hits $140

By Arif Sharif and Alaa Shahine

March 8 (Bloomberg) -- Nouriel Roubini, the economist who predicted the global financial crisis, said an increase in oil prices to $140 a barrel will cause some advanced economies to slide back into recession.

Underlying how fragile the global economic recovery is, Roubini said the European Central Bank may be making a mistake by raising interest rates “too soon” when debt-ridden countries on the euro region’s periphery struggle to restore the competitiveness of exports.

“If you had the oil price going up to where it was in the summer of 2008, at $140 a barrel, at that point some of the advanced economies will start to double dip,” he told reporters in Dubai today. “In the U.S., where growth is accelerating fast, a 15 to 20 percent increase in oil prices, there won’t be double dip, but growth reaching a stalled speed again.”

Popular revolts sweeping the Middle East and North Africa, home to more than half of the world’s proven oil reserves, have pushed Brent crude-oil prices close to $120. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. raised its forecast for Brent crude in the second quarter of the year to $105 a barrel amid fighting in Libya between Muammar Qaddafi and rebels seeking to end his four-decade rule.

Crude for April delivery fell as much as $2.11 to $103.33 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange, and was at $105 at 5:19 p.m. in Dubai. Yesterday, the contract settled at $105.44, the highest since Sept. 26, 2008. Prices are up 27 percent from a year ago.

IMF Forecast

In January, the International Monetary Fund revised its forecast for global economic growth this year to 4.4 percent from an earlier estimate of 4.2 percent, reflecting stronger U.S. output based on tax-cut extensions, while emerging nations lead the recovery.

Oil prices at their current levels probably won’t lead to a “significant” acceleration in inflation in advanced economies because they are recovering from a “severe recession” and still face high unemployment, Roubini, 52, told a conference on hedge funds in the Persian Gulf emirate earlier today.

“Workers don’t have much wage-bargaining power,” he said.

Joblessness in the U.S. unexpectedly dropped to 8.9 percent in February, according to a March 4 report from the Labor Department. The rate fell for a third straight month to the lowest level in almost two years as employers boosted payrolls by 192,000 amid growing confidence in the expansion.

The U.S. economy grew at a 2.8 percent annual rate in the fourth quarter, up from 2.6 percent in the previous three months, according to figures from the Commerce Department.

‘Barely Enough’

Still, Roubini said job creation this year in the U.S., the world’s biggest economy, is going to be “barely enough to satisfy the increase in labor supply.”

With unemployment keeping core inflation in check, raising interest rates in some advanced economies too soon would be a mistake, Roubini said.

ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet said on March 3 that policy makers may boost borrowing costs as soon as next month to fight increasing price pressures even as governments from Spain to Ireland struggle to lower their budget deficits and revive economic growth. Euro-region inflation quickened to 2.4 percent last month, the fastest since October 2008.

“My view of it is that the ECB is worrying too much about inflation,” Roubini said. A premature increase in interest rates by European policy makers may put “significant” pressure on the Bank of England to follow suit, he said.

U.K. Squeeze

The U.K. government is engaged in the country’s biggest fiscal squeeze since World War II as growth faltered and the economy shrank in the final quarter of 2010. With spending cuts due to take effect from next month, Prime Minister David Cameron is trying to drive growth in the private sector by easing planning restrictions, cutting business taxes and making it easier for small companies to bid for public contracts.

Soaring food and energy costs pushed inflation to 4 percent in January, twice the Bank of England’s target. While the central bank expects inflation to accelerate in the coming months, it has kept its benchmark interest rate unchanged. Still, three of the Bank of England’s nine policy makers last month voted for an increase.

“In the U.K., things are even more complicated because even before the monetary and fiscal tightening, fourth-quarter growth was negative,” Roubini said. “Monetary and fiscal tightening is coming to the U.K. at the worst of all times, when the economic activity is weak.”

The U.K. economy may expand 2 percent this year and 2.3 percent in 2012, according to IMF projections in January.

In the developing economies, the Washington-based lender expects consumer prices to average 6 percent this year. Roubini said inflation in some emerging economies “where monetary policy is behind the curve” risks going “out of control, in some cases to double digits,” unless central banks start raising interest rates soon or use exchange rates to stabilize prices.

To contact the reporters on this story: Arif Sharif in Dubai at asharif2@bloomberg.net; Alaa Shahine in Dubai at asalha@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Andrew J. Barden at barden@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: March 8, 2011 09:07 EST



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (9432)3/11/2011 11:15:03 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 119358
 
Don't bury the dollar just yet

finance.fortune.cnn.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (9432)3/13/2011 12:22:35 PM
From: stockman_scott1 Recommendation  Respond to of 119358
 
How Black is the Japanese Nuclear Swan?

theautomaticearth.blogspot.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (9432)3/14/2011 6:48:22 PM
From: stockman_scott2 Recommendations  Respond to of 119358
 
What if we’re not broke?

washingtonpost.com

By E.J. Dionne Jr.
Columnist
The Washington Post
Sunday, March 13, 7:49 PM

“We’re broke.”

You can practically break a search engine if you start looking around the Internet for those words. They’re used repeatedly with reference to our local, state and federal governments, almost always to make a case for slashing programs — and, lately, to go after public-employee unions. The phrase is designed to create a sense of crisis that justifies rapid and radical actions before citizens have a chance to debate the consequences.

Just one problem: We’re not broke. Yes, nearly all levels of government face fiscal problems because of the economic downturn. But there is no crisis. There are many different paths open to fixing public budgets. And we will come up with wiser and more sustainable solutions if we approach fiscal problems calmly, realizing that we’re still a very rich country and that the wealthiest among us are doing exceptionally well.

Consider two of the most prominent we’re-brokers, House Speaker John Boehner and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker.

“We’re broke, broke going on bankrupt,” Boehner said in a Feb. 28 Nashville speech. For Boehner, this “fact” justifies the $61 billion in domestic spending cuts House Republicans passed (cuts that would have a negligible impact on the long-term deficit). Boehner’s GOP colleagues want reductions in Head Start, student loans and scores of other programs voters like, and the only way to sell them is to cry catastrophe.

Walker, of course, used the “we’re broke” rationale to justify his attack on public-worker collective bargaining rights. Yet the state’s supposedly “broke” status did not stop him from approving tax cuts before he began his war on unions and proposed all manner of budget cuts, including deep reductions in aid to public schools.

In both cases, the fiscal issues are just an excuse for ideologically driven policies to lower taxes on well-off people and business while reducing government programs. Yet only occasionally do journalists step back to ask: Are these guys telling the truth?

The admirable Web site PolitiFact.com examined Walker’s claim in detail and concluded flatly it was “false.”

“Experts agree the state faces financial challenges in the form of deficits,” PolitiFact wrote. “But they also agree the state isn’t broke. Employees and bills are being paid. Services are continuing to be performed. Revenue continues to roll in. A variety of tools — taxes, layoffs, spending cuts, debt shifting — is available to make ends meet. Walker has promised not to increase taxes. That takes one tool off the table.”

And that’s the whole point.

Bloomberg News looked at Boehner’s statement and declared simply: “It’s wrong.” As Bloomberg’s David J. Lynch wrote: “The U.S. today is able to borrow at historically low interest rates, paying 0.68 percent on a two-year note that it had to offer at 5.1 percent before the financial crisis began in 2007. Financial products that pay off if Uncle Sam defaults aren’t attracting unusual investor demand. And tax revenue as a percentage of the economy is at a 60-year low, meaning if the government needs to raise cash and can summon the political will, it could do so.”

Precisely. A phony metaphor is being used to hijack the nation’s political conversation and skew public policies to benefit better-off Americans and hurt most others.

We have an 8.9 percent unemployment rate, yet further measures to spur job creation are off the table. We’re broke, you see. We have a $15 trillion economy, yet we pretend to be an impoverished nation with no room for public investments in our future or efforts to ease the pain of a deep recession on those Americans who didn’t profit from it or cause it in the first place.

As Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) pointed out in a little-noticed but powerful speech on the economy in December, “during the past 20 years, 56 percent of all income growth went to the top 1 percent of households. Even more unbelievably, a third of all income growth went to just the top one-tenth of 1 percent.” Some people are definitely not broke, yet we can’t even think about raising their taxes.

By contrast, Franken noted that “when you adjust for inflation, the median household income actually declined over the last decade.” Many of those folks are going broke, yet because “we’re broke,” we’re told we can’t possibly help them.

Give Boehner, Walker and their allies full credit for diverting our attention with an arresting metaphor. The rest of us are dupes if we fall for it.

ejdionne@washpost.com

© 2011 The Washington Post Company



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (9432)3/25/2011 4:50:23 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 119358
 
Want to go to war? Then show us the money.

tinyurl.com



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (9432)3/29/2011 11:56:07 AM
From: gregor_us28 Recommendations  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 119358
 
CR, your normalcy bias which has been running pretty strong the past year has finally caught up with you. Housing is not only crashing a second time but the twin effects of a burst credit bubble and peak oil foretold such an outcome. Pretty easily. You have been tagging your posts, however, the past year with the view that the economy was recovering, and that a second leg down in housing would be mild. More broadly, I have noted that you never include the energy component in your outlook except as a small, marginal factor. It's not marginal. My work on California's economy over the past two years, which has looked at the growth in food stamp useage and the effects of high energy prices on a massive auto and highway complex has shown that California has not recovered at all. I'm surprised that you have leaned positive on the US economy, when housing and California remained in such sorry condition. The data on California employment is grim, and the benchmark revisions released Friday were eye-opening. It really does seem to escape you that we are not in a recession but a depression, and I don't know why you're so averse to such terminology. This is a textbook depression, in the sense that its a long cycle debt-deflation. No, it's not the Great Depression. Not yet, at least.

The built environment of the US--and especially California--combined with the enormous debt overhang and a new price regime for oil means that wages are now at a ceiling. Indeed, they have been at a ceiling for some time in real terms. The American house, in this situation, used to function as a call option on future wage growth. But if you take future wages growth away, that reprices the call option. This is what's happened, and will continue to happen to US housing.

In short, I think your habit of downplaying this situation in your commentary is no longer...playing.

Let's see you address California.

Best,

Gregor