Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Mobile Computing - OSs & Manufacturers UNMODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (3093)	3/2/2011 9:32:52 AM
From: Sam	1 Recommendation Respond to of 3170

XOOM vs. iPad v1 BOM comparison according to iSuppli/Digitimes; since iPad v2 is about to come out, not sure how relevant this is, but--I'll post it anyway, FWIW. XOOM BOM totals US$359.92, says IHS iSuppli Press release; Willie Teng, DIGITIMES [Wednesday 2 March 2011] digitimes.com The Motorola XOOM's materials cost closely approximates that of a comparably equipped iPad, as revealed by a physical dissection conducted by the IHS iSuppli. The XOOM carries a bill of materials (BOM) of US$359.92, based on current pricing, compared to approximately US$320 for a 3G iPad with 32GB of NAND flash memory, based on pricing from April 2010. Note that this BOM assessment is preliminary; it accounts only for hardware costs and does not take into consideration other expenses such as manufacturing software, licensing, royalties or other costs. "With its features and functionality, the XOOM is clearly designed to go head-to-head against the iPad 3G," said Wayne Lam, senior analyst, competitive analysis, at IHS. "In pursuing that design philosophy, Motorola has closely lined up the XOOM's component costs with that of the iPad's, especially where it counts: in the touch screen, the display and the cellular radio. Of all the 'iPad killers' analyzed by the IHS iSuppli teardown team, the XOOM best approximates the cost/performance standard set by Apple." The XOOM resembles the mid-range iPad with its capacitive touch screen, 10.1-inch display, high-capacity battery and 32GB memory density. However, the XOOM zooms ahead of the original iPad with features like its fast dual-core apps processor and the addition of both front- and rear-facing cameras. "The XOOM earns its status as a true iPad competitor by virtue of the fact that it equals many of the iPad's best features, while also making up for some of the iPad's shortcomings, such as the lack of a camera, at least until Apple begins shipping its second-generation product line," Lam noted. Just as in the iPad, the display and touch screen assembly represents the most expensive subsystem within the XOOM. The XOOM's display and touch screen section costs US$140, or 38.9% of the total BOM cost. In comparison the iPad's 9.7-inch display/touch screen assembly carries a cost of US$125, based on pricing from our analysis last year. The XOOM's thin-film transistor liquid-crystal display (TFT-LCD) supports 262,000 colors and has a denser pixel format than the iPad at 1,280 by 800. The iPad's TFT-advanced fringe field switching (AFFS) display also has 262,000 colors and a resolution of 1,024 by 768 pixels. However, the iPad display employs in-plane switching (IPS) technology, which allows for a wider viewing angle and better picture quality in terms of color presentation than a conventional LCD. The XOOM touch screen module features the Atmel mXT1386 touch screen controller, a new 32-bit device capable of registering up to 16 discrete touch points. The Atmel controller is implemented in a four-discrete-chip solution. This multi-chip solution for touch screen controls represents an arguably more expensive design than the custom Texas Instruments/Broadcom touch screen solution employed in the original iPad. Also mirroring the iPad 3G in terms of cost, the memory is next most expensive subsystem of the XOOM. The grand total cost for the Motorola XOOM's memory components is US$80.40, or 22.3% of the total BOM. This compares to US$67.80 for the equivalent 32GB model of the iPad. The additional cost of the XOOM's memory is accounted for by the two Elpida mobile double data rate (DDR) 2 synchronous dynamic random access memories (DRAM). These 4-gigabit-density parts support the XOOM's high-speed dual-core microprocessor, giving the tablet a total of 1GB of SDRAM to run Android 3.0's more advanced features, such as the multitasking of applications. The memory subsystem also includes the 32GB NAND flash from Toshiba, which accounts for the bulk of the cost of this section. One of the most dramatic cost differentials between the XOOM and iPad is in the apps processor. The XOOM processor and associated components costs an estimated US$20.78, or 5.8% of the BOM. This is almost twice the cost of the iPad 3G's A4 processor at slightly less than US$11. The XOOM employs a dual-core Nvidia Tegra 2 apps processor, compared to the single-core A4. This more advanced part boosts both the performance-and the cost-for the XOOM. The XOOM's two cameras also represent a major cost disparity between the XOOM and iPad. The 5-megapixel camera on the back and the 2-megapixel device on the front carry a collective cost of US$14, or 3.9% of the BOM. In contrast, the original iPad 3G has no cameras.