SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (414387)3/3/2011 9:52:10 PM
From: D. Long5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794488
 
Just the opposite of the result he wanted

And he has taken away the time to brief a stay before the Court of Appeals, another potential source of foot dragging. Vinson told Obama - put up or shut up.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (414387)3/3/2011 10:10:28 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794488
 
What happens if the Obama administration ignores the order?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (414387)3/3/2011 11:39:56 PM
From: Bill15 Recommendations  Respond to of 794488
 
The administration argued in its brief that a single federal judge does not have the authority to bring an entire regulatory scheme to a halt prior to appeal. In his response, Vinson points out on page 13 that the statute they cited for this faulty conclusion was repealed by congress in 1976. lol


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News