Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (71554)	3/6/2011 1:41:16 AM
From: TobagoJack	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219998

<<So Chinese soldiers are necessary to maintain "law and order" in Sudan? Not doing a very good job, it would seem.>> ... so it would seem that china is ok with internally generated regime change and deal with the incoming administration, presumably by and for the people, by revolutioanry definition. i understand team usa is busy shoring up tyranny and despair in saudi arabia, otoh. <<Or maybe Chinese soldiers are behind the genocide in Darfur?>> ... not that i have heard, although the french allies of team usa seem to have a big hand in the weapons of tripoli, and should events go, we shall soon enough see american weapons swing into action mode is arabia, for the people, by the people and against the people <<Exactly who was S. Vietnam liberated from?>> ... not sure and hardly matters, but can ask the n.vietnamese. <<A fair number of S. Vietnamese were refugees from N. Vietnam.. presumably because they wanted to be liberated from Hanoi so badly there were willing to give up all their major possessions>> ... enough jews of the east google.com constituted the boat people google.com , abandoned by team america, as america tended to do <<dominos ... To keep them from falling exactly where? Into the sphere of influence of the USSR?>> hardly matters, dominos are dominos. <<If you're so fraternal, why didn't China remain in N. Korea, as they did in Tibet? Btw, it was 1950, not 1952.>> ... close enough, all n.korean leaders read and understand chinese language, is that not fraternal enough? enough south korean leaders know same, per fraternal imperative ;0) <<You mean the actual original residents of Tibet? Because no one else has ever proven to be a threat to them that I can recall>> ... you are mistaken Message 27214477 , particularly this threat Message 27214475 <<Only Beijing>> ... you are deliberately mistaken, or you forgot the write "and washington" google.com "and london" google.com